Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1521837ybz; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 02:47:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL99wHO8VX8/21rADJH4tK6xQyPEfSgH8pefNGhRPUS3ZkT5AZFv3RUYj+T70W1zQZ49xV7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dc02:: with SMTP id yy2mr6906362ejb.11.1587203244098; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 02:47:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587203244; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GsGEMDUQMAkubcUzvh1ndZuCXoayfst2UdNUQMgZ8hKG4oF8Y4uKdnf5neK3ZM7BVs xw/w9N+ecFycGijO/ZuHyk0c4UaNpHycWBNPYDnLJe2LWvlbnflvUAveZm+jdFhPny0y bFlZn7ZPkpblK0zfvoDK8wgD7FQIc9iu8EduqZWTHANYlgoWPsS4xYV3VeQCFfJbt9Y3 I3OpAYb8SW8m0ktBm6n7KRKnP6U0j79ZMIVdiwB0EWXLYrc5f44hF2CHhl51EMPrrp1F dqEcHHzbJhd/E6Y/aj2VuzWOUq/rhZqOkxbMpQ6y9GZKSmHAzjtNpIRG7dCLwSlLVq5d HeJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=MvPVlDoSj9vhSW67Xf2AOilOAExO4Oba82eE1HmHl3c=; b=rKtn3cLzplibmo/BQMR8Wx38nPto3yyYNDx36NqSTFV1liBV/LAmv8WNuv7fGlQ++1 3QgU1GXl8qTh9bBmGLhhQeWs6HGFl4QFafJw2Giz75JHKXBEA7i6L2gO2fqCEetZVnST qdrCEXcpKzfAGiORpuVpLft9DQ+xtlHu+YrG+S/+d3G1AHxl9zPf+S+V3rAoaoYGNjiE U0aTuRqZ7KhdRqtT2crM6We0ks2jRhLZkyR9R2DaCJaNYp3/9zE+MfIo+RqZat7Qc9ej EOTDtuR/o7leoB+qDVfRNIWbKDhLL3Eeujsr8W9xlMNNS9CgZ9j0Wv36jY099raVEFka GRGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s7si15966622edh.266.2020.04.18.02.47.01; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 02:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726012AbgDRJo7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 18 Apr 2020 05:44:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43952 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725887AbgDRJo7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2020 05:44:59 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C16C2C061A0C for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 02:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jPk1w-0006ZA-G8; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:44:56 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE06E101304; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:44:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Marc Dionne Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: FreeNAS VM disk access errors, bisected to commit 6f1a4891a592 In-Reply-To: References: <87d085zwy9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:44:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgh1xh48.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marc, Marc Dionne writes: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:19 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> That makes me assume that the staged approach of changing affinity for >> this non-maskable MSI mess makes your particular hypervisor unhappy. >> >> Are there any messages like this: >> >> "do_IRQ: 0.83 No irq handler for vector" > > I haven't seen those although I only have a VNC console that scrolls > by rather fast. > I did see a report from someone running Ubuntu 18.04 which had this > after the initial errors: > > do_IRQ: 2.35 No irq handler for vector > ata1.00: revalidation failed (error=-5) I expected that and it points to an issue on the HV side either in affinity management or in the local APIC emulation. Thanks, tglx