Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2582099ybz; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 04:55:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKqnzhgabRwt9yNzvn8VGex0AoMEtCzLueRHfMQdziqLV4bx/n/fdbQVt3/uHdrV+V7W4ui X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d504:: with SMTP id y4mr2367102edq.295.1587297301086; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 04:55:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587297301; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JCuJRoBInaQL+/whRSPjMLhuO39DgO7erNJOpBF2BZmcAcNErbYaDpu2wvnF2Aeftw M40xs4/FBPe96J1PKd+H3CoOQrAMTxyUPqdkOOq6KwWpFoThBhNqRSxz1DwxgflIFK8u PAOfxUy5Z+NsgttAxFuQ0/RdkNZKqhZnRb8NrJ3Zd616I+UjtJlFg6z6LHICPn5I/SGw YRX+fJ8XrOO0OeHLn4P5BRq/1MRXkaGNs8K2NKXXVI9BeLMrIDOyls8t4N9r7KG0/2U4 bKLDcRL6wQoXcDGORrjaTcABc5tVgBpnqeoF0iNMS0RLq5CT5utcI75UILnvlo+LxC/W vKyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=OqmB+gSn9S4Bnc1Ci5z070Q3vf/HZ7SWl+guN1A8Iqc=; b=vAphF3evktQu6LIOQild42nrl1IMYPsxR1M/P+inMJMsG1/gb2QlgYHDbYa96G1cbk 2t9wcxHX4wyY7rjKjbhkEvEpFjsd9/7ueTCthKdpW+3bMRYGmj7ii0dDDeOiLABD2enM /yXxqEFC246kdUNmJc7Y32/Vn2VSo4AqP93QwW8MfOv6jKqU8FIFHxc2EsL4YvXqvRFL BfWSMR7qKxwkqE2leORqrjMNA4vM60TeSBV8ZeYEUizR2Uc75ynvIh+/wlTKTjglAmjt ekHUTjit1rZZMN6OvYfof9X+7NoW/2c43jpzuAU6kBxXmz69VAXmZl4VFGr4sU4zL4PC R4OQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m4si16204716ejc.103.2020.04.19.04.54.36; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 04:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725948AbgDSLxj (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:53:39 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:59978 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725841AbgDSLxj (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:53:39 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ8W1-0003fL-D0; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 05:53:37 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ8Vz-0006Fr-TU; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 05:53:37 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Jeremy Kerr , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200414070142.288696-1-hch@lst.de> <87r1wl68gf.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200419081926.GA12539@lst.de> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 06:50:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200419081926.GA12539@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:19:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87o8rn3d9z.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1jQ8Vz-0006Fr-TU;;;mid=<87o8rn3d9z.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1++Xt8JJKQGcbPJViucMNdTMbptPpl2UTk= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4919] * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Christoph Hellwig X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1033 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 14 (1.4%), b_tie_ro: 12 (1.2%), parse: 0.89 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (1.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.11 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.9 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.33 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.14 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 64 (6.2%), check_bayes: 62 (6.0%), b_tokenize: 4.7 (0.5%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (0.7%), b_comp_prob: 2.2 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 43 (4.2%), b_finish: 1.23 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 150 (14.5%), check_dkim_signature: 0.45 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.1 (0.3%), poll_dns_idle: 756 (73.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 779 (75.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v2 X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 05:41:52PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> > this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and >> > coredump code. Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are >> > those to the spufs coredump code. >> > >> > Changes since v1: >> > - properly spell NUL >> > - properly handle the compat siginfo case in ELF coredumps >> >> Quick question is exec from a kernel thread within the scope of what you >> are looking at? >> >> There is a set_fs(USER_DS) in flush_old_exec whose sole purpose appears >> to be to allow exec from kernel threads. Where the kernel threads >> run with set_fs(KERNEL_DS) until they call exec. > > This series doesn't really look at that area. But I don't think exec > from a kernel thread makes any sense, and cleaning up how to set the > initial USER_DS vs KERNEL_DS state is something I'll eventually get to, > it seems like a major mess at the moment. Fair enough. I just wanted to make certain that it is on people's radar that when the kernel exec's init the arguments are read from kernel memory and the set_fs(USER_DS) in flush_old_exec() that makes that not work later. It is subtle and easy to miss. So I figured I would mention it since I have been staring at the exec code a lot lately. Eric