Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964784AbWCBSXU (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:23:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964791AbWCBSXU (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:23:20 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]:30361 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964784AbWCBSXT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:23:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=o5yuq0Lz/A+SUJuC35UV8/nTUmJbJIW1ZpgwJZ6uRUChNiUOrXGt/8l2fYHBKuZBaJyO93CusGTdqo9CQNymnlr1XIPueHAnV/dXVNuGQb4sf64g8Sf+FUjlG4NCqX/G7St/PFh0eAlIhkB+y/iFDs6EF/20rK76rty5nS9//CY= Message-ID: <9a8748490603021023j4c9af732y9d52a2a4a6f4ee97@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:23:18 +0100 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Andi Kleen" Subject: Re: Another compile problem with 2.6.15.5 on AMD64 Cc: "Steffen Weber" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Christoph Lameter" , J.E.J.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, stable@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200603021917.52268.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <44071AF3.1010400@steffenweber.net> <4407347F.1000209@steffenweber.net> <200603021916.50053.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> <200603021917.52268.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1310 Lines: 38 On 3/2/06, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 02 March 2006 19:16, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > Andi, Christoph : would this make sense as a fix for -stable ? > > It's already fixed in stable. > Hmm, ok, so it's in the queue for 2.6.15.6 (since it obviously isn't in current 2.6.15.5 -stable as that's where Steffen hit it), that's good. > > How about mainline ? > > mainline never had this problem. The backport was just bad. > Hmm, I see that at least two things from the patch seems to be aplicable to at least current -mm (haven't checked latest Linus -git yet). The bit that removes BITS_PER_BYTE from arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_cat.c and the bit that removes the duplicate #include and substitutes it with #include those bits would seem to apply to 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 include/linux/types.h already has the BITSPER_BYTE define in -mm. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/