Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S278493AbRJVKnf>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 06:43:35 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S278492AbRJVKnZ>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 06:43:25 -0400
Received: from ns.aub.dk ([195.24.1.195]:9463 "EHLO Princess")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S278493AbRJVKnK>;
	Mon, 22 Oct 2001 06:43:10 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Allan Sandfeld <linux@sneulv.dk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:40:49 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3]
In-Reply-To: <20011022112149.A5625@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20011022112149.A5625@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <E15vcVm-000290-00@Princess>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 22 October 2001 12:21, Alan Cox wrote:
> Things took a bit longer than intended with various security fixes needing
> to be done. If this tree tests out ok it will be 2.2.20
>
> 2.2.20pre11
> o	Security fixes
> 	| Details censored in accordance with the US DMCA

Why? I didnt think you like it, nor lived in the US?

If v'ger is in the US, I can understand not putting it in the changelog 
there. But why not on the mailing list?

regards
`Allan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/