Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932446AbWCBUQe (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:16:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932295AbWCBUQe (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:16:34 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.204]:1051 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932446AbWCBUQe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:16:34 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VqmI2svPBsyc6RioD1Cc4+3QQSUVSbVHCGvM46lQaofMRmdOOna04KP60YVTefeAkmSHnC3SvIy3gozi8BVtg6IcJ4N/cGmzNmkZygjyJ1aeS9wVH1fa0GYyE7hHbTTURtjWuKLDtZ0Y5tzXP9UnB31vj5gc95ZPkebriA9O0Dk= Message-ID: <9a8748490603021216u344a3915g6ca0df42bb51b867@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:16:32 +0100 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 Cc: "Laurent Riffard" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Martin Bligh" , "Christoph Lameter" , "Eric W. Biederman" In-Reply-To: <9a8748490603011741o122e652ica20a9fcffed3d41@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060228042439.43e6ef41.akpm@osdl.org> <9a8748490602281313t4106dcccl982dc2966b95e0a7@mail.gmail.com> <4404CE39.6000109@liberouter.org> <9a8748490602281430x736eddf9l98e0de201b14940a@mail.gmail.com> <4404DA29.7070902@free.fr> <20060228162157.0ed55ce6.akpm@osdl.org> <9a8748490603011741o122e652ica20a9fcffed3d41@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 38 On 3/2/06, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 3/1/06, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Could people please test a couple more patchsets, see if we can isolate it? > > > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.16-rc5-mm1.1.gz > > > > Haven't had time to test this one yet, and won't have time until tomorrow :( > I just tested this kernel and it builds and runs just fine. Can't crash it with my eclipse test case. > > > and http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.16-rc5-mm1.2.gz is > > I've tested this one and I can't crash it with eclipse like I could > plain old 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 > With all the recent patches and proposed patches and discussions about various approaches to fix this I've lost track. What kernel with what patches applied and/or reverted would it make the most sense for me to test now, in order to provide the most useful testing? -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/