Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3946205ybz; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:24:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKwda0RDrO9RPupGV30FXz3sWVHl6Vt987UWXQyUhG15DtuqHNQCNwk68HAzKk4ckfyz1KP X-Received: by 2002:a50:e107:: with SMTP id h7mr16349913edl.124.1587410683886; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:24:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587410683; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iMSZEVZL5qKzNwk9Ag8nrnJUYEGXLH2jXBBhOhHI5TG7HgpHAYA//o1nCVbLsJGqji nOVCFGEfECUl5s+psqiYd3K3oS7baiUX9X4VLp2FjoZweNpLkB72BX52kw8UoP9/KABF AyUTpmmtpnZCUIZxdt3gXf1qR55kGRYXaSc69Sz9Dp1sFcM04DVcra+8mSr83UzLzUGR gnKWDVfGv0bE80n5RgvQDpBOMWQMvoWvTRbjxYwpzcpTnFgFDkMvJGlMdkE2cVcLY0GO 1xMHZEUsaT4Z56v90mjWvGXFumpDK89t8E+eF0venrn0zj4GJ18e99fGXHG6s7vh7wRU r92A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=GzfzOoyXgNqA0QKTYs8CnDSrpA/P12Ud9BwF/5nKjYE=; b=Az++E/qeIw2yNv+ANN9CWdPRiHfAQBt76ohH7yBl7/7zD3WhbQoiHwyA+03wDciyQ9 v17LL86l5y5IjjOXRJRJ/VZIwA8CMVzW/cYHEfucEmQgh7zYmM6Dulm9hYX4JFBg1M2H 5Sq+hnB87mlS2JOHZntwp7C3e4TtdnmKHJXg9R2Fo3MU5mi/HWrIQuNUHxnqsvVtuX1q OyEvPlo30AqoG3et0PAJ4FuLQUztm/SHTMaKDz5wmwg3KAtwpZPIOkEC+YLAe/79WW1Q 7yDDode7aY321IipMTPoj7FwJWXkBYZ3vpBQb5EmZV9ngQNVQI8SVIT6/HOkFnkPA5n6 PR/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z25si218848edq.323.2020.04.20.12.24.19; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726214AbgDTTXK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:23:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38210 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725897AbgDTTXK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:23:10 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3B5420736; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:23:06 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Mark Rutland Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Sami Tolvanen , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , James Morse , Ard Biesheuvel , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dave Martin , Kees Cook , Laura Abbott , Marc Zyngier , Masami Hiramatsu , Nick Desaulniers , Jann Horn , Miguel Ojeda , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/12] scs: disable when function graph tracing is enabled Message-ID: <20200420152306.2d45e3c4@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200417154613.GB9529@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20191018161033.261971-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20200416161245.148813-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20200416161245.148813-5-samitolvanen@google.com> <20200417100039.GS20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200417144620.GA9529@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20200417152645.GH20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200417154613.GB9529@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:46:14 +0100 Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > And doesn't BPF also do stuff like this? > > > > > > Can BPF mess with return addresses now!? > > > > At least on x86 I think it does. But what do I know, I can't operate > > that stuff. Rostedt might know. > > Sounds like I might need to do some digging... May want to ping Alexei. It appears that if BPF adds a direct hook to a function, it will prevent the function graph tracer from tracing it. :-/ -- Steve