Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3948246ybz; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:27:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIqkzZFS36NFdly4UwAcpyj+MtttBXS0kR9Xs0zaBJcoh44e7KnEZ0Bsxfmvr5Kk5+1e3By X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5e45:: with SMTP id b5mr17104392eju.0.1587410828718; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:27:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587410828; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G8Nl/1kqffJx3JBtcamfGIuxZbbpODgObJ4KftqLsypfi5KoD9db1B+WHjOBi5Wj3q /uevgjdQRX7ETuu8MEZ6ct7vLOc6LMUJM5pQZWOcV+2Iwm2nYlaXWp7+afCjBR46+eVV pDpXcZSsJ0gHhbRJfvoZb0zwh5i5Gm8GLHQuEWe72G7tPxQQjsN6mnwzAdg1JXivo8l/ PwOg6hNrbNpQKQOfOuxz/LAhV2i6/+sQ3gjnTvcNCM9v4QjypCyEwJou4x2ukYpyt/Ra CMETsN767Nd+Lc+UtWF86nQXvYsRCkZ8AeoZzyf/Pj6uaYBanlNvTIM81PkOep69Rx9G tuiw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=1YuFJrpCywKX/ru6CgGT4p1ibPU8mCdoRQpUpGvC5RA=; b=yTuBtQ3juMgxrfEqxHW3RnSZJ+E9mxLxjdTk1wfDb6ij44zLm4pxVm+/6rf0wccuy/ 1EkFmlF/YqJoIAKeZvi/uqd1KHOENk25y4bxRmUc4wMzyYNl+wTt4FT2tSpfya7t9svU dvFX6tRXshYaZC07vy5RXlRkp90dDOgY36tWRIjlh5gUF9bOlQSUBkznR89uWtl18UuO UnWqaoHVrAn1a4yv5+PuXqNXZY/mYeX+lflftx8SIGQUnowVQKeZZiWa8fWSIngl8wZb LEr9KLoBO8jtP5/zjnwQHXBBzcyBwPc7zQqxudx1IvJmDDB0Q+te7Aefvmmhe2t7gb9M iifw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=K6dzNYEy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t9si226395edj.538.2020.04.20.12.26.45; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=K6dzNYEy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727902AbgDTTXa (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:23:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39772 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725896AbgDTTX3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:23:29 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F38C061A0C for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:23:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=1YuFJrpCywKX/ru6CgGT4p1ibPU8mCdoRQpUpGvC5RA=; b=K6dzNYEyCQ5AWIZMkQIgE40HQm dh/BiL/NzvNmSSvYu4w1srUOpf8aGShDFt8H3PM80RSoRI9VljkJlE76nSyoMsn8AL8cCvjHEI5Yc 6+bUnusFAmulLXvCXiH4xp7ce7H/AbSBSdiqi0lBPDg7Aqc/7J5z8rUWYKTGL0wpiADgkl0OlxNGW mziyiqMMKZ0zFgL9YJOmg5h3AgNqHFBKXXS7LG4qKXVly3BjtSblFHdgDADXoPklfm3QBkigEXTzV dMqWlSUsQnJK6J/q0EsAP5OjISyJ4xifvqF3hpkgekoC7ANT70F+ktqDj5qY8RdBBCs1Rh6N8v+6v v8EYWfMg==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jQc0o-0003T9-7A; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:23:22 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:23:22 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Daniel Jordan Cc: Michel Lespinasse , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Laurent Dufour , Vlastimil Babka , Liam Howlett , Jerome Glisse , Davidlohr Bueso , David Rientjes , Hugh Dickins , Ying Han , Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] mmap locking API: add mmap_read_trylock_non_owner() Message-ID: <20200420192322.GD5820@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20200415004353.130248-1-walken@google.com> <20200415004353.130248-8-walken@google.com> <20200420182211.exrzkszefraeylv2@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200420182211.exrzkszefraeylv2@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 02:22:11PM -0400, Daniel Jordan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:43:50PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c > > index 11d41f0c7005..998968659892 100644 > > --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c > > @@ -317,7 +316,7 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs, > > * with build_id. > > */ > > if (!user || !current || !current->mm || irq_work_busy || > > - mmap_read_trylock(current->mm) == 0) { > > + !mmap_read_trylock_non_owner(current->mm)) { > > /* cannot access current->mm, fall back to ips */ > > for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) { > > id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP; > > @@ -342,16 +341,10 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs, > > } > > > > if (!work) { > > - mmap_read_unlock(current->mm); > > + mmap_read_unlock_non_owner(current->mm); > > These 'non_owner' calls are not intuitive because current _is the owner, so the > v3 version seems better, even if it adds a special wrapper for rwsem_release. > > Though it makes some sense if you think, "we're consistently using the > non_owner APIs because there's a legitimate use somewhere else," so I'm fine > either way. I'm not really a big fan of v3 nor v4. What I'd like to see is a 'transfer of ownership' API. This could be to a different task, IRQ work, RCU, softirq, timer, ... That would let us track locking dependencies across complex flows, eg this wouldn't be warned about right now: rcu_work(): lock(C) kfree(B) unlock(A) unlock(C) thread 1: lock(A) call_rcu(B) thread 2: lock(C) synchronize_rcu() unlock(C) but if we had an API that transferred ownership of A to RCU, then we'd see the C->RCU->A->C cycle. This is perhaps a bit much work to require of Laurent in order to get this patchset merged, but something to think about.