Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3999842ybz; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:33:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJE45XaqFKky+rSYm/FVFy1lKV6GcxxOT0uKtt7Ee2/rtJ840GgBJUEn/xMwv0xyckRBpTN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1641:: with SMTP id n1mr18117305ejd.365.1587414782929; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:33:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587414782; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HOXTZ8qqAskfquiJUEMA+A0hkWCZoEmXk06joo9xsXA/kYUCZSpV5GS57xMb2VX5pB vFNSBNcOiAriA/Oxo8VLYsMRn1BAg5MwXmrQAS0eST15POAXWdZwUs1r6g2h6jVD37oI 8wu3mvDrgL23nFzIZyijhvzXApChXSi2bOqF3qiAucw9vaRyDoVQxC7K2JLkUJhIgxHW TDW4ut5/M0VBRJ6jlLSJpcgdU3X4IhA51jELIZ7GsUTSYnm5MB91Kf+pctCieFDoujOy 9aBUW0w+qE14sNDqhyx6I+J1uZJ3og0eYwAj++XMG0QSgtzsVsJ9U5ZfhmODOvrM1/DI Pzug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=JMLwYzWJFZJjSwbOPBsyhMipS7z6+ryERcPhvkMB9Yw=; b=JbD6lo/5jsYK7gq6CbQqH+wB4pRu+xGtMtnIhmZOWQ49GaPyl7WjuJlKbAs2ODHnlD wWMOYimP8ztEwAUI5se9mwQw5tat52UpGWAtw2ZSpyLNZo8O8HjkxBegfWGsXMWDxi1/ hhs+WNDvzm/jFWMEDUIBVKmYGxj31ayCMT3LClzabnHZBcsFkGqUtWpg7zSx9kaO626M zpA8lscg6vcdBdTt7Z8I9KgWTegHXSJt0XUF75uxBC8XoQ28Ls0yygCJhuO5+dnaZolm ELWsPBT/KmppNtyIoyE52AOB0n0QulJuiv1Ltd/dga2e8hqUVn4Uv+rA6GWUhT/Pu/7u giYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.s=fm1 header.b=VtGDLXJb; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="J/4OyVfJ"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rl27si216040ejb.17.2020.04.20.13.32.39; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.s=fm1 header.b=VtGDLXJb; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="J/4OyVfJ"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726869AbgDTUbt (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:31:49 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:38991 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725774AbgDTUbs (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:31:48 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50805C0097; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:31:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=JMLwYzWJFZJjSwbOPBsyhMipS7z 6+ryERcPhvkMB9Yw=; b=VtGDLXJb3zfGugu1hjkG1Uax9FJD6+tV6sJNQjtMxjF HOSBLh0HJyvUEa8VtQc1ib9Duxm15hAKDn2q1G2GO7zeJBIytKM1VWIW1NOC264A 7yGmwRct8dErhAv9q8sQ52OrjuKSNO3R/PtA7U1PmtSEL2Ki87GduIwpL+/lwwLN nmlLWERTkbbj5RAFYpJkOsjvVPVpk85gQmo1uj1Yg8Lph41YrQE+sSo/suzFSHMT 2ApRTUJGI0TTr1xcHMShetYZ6puc7xEb+fQXp66Gi6F9k7qe086gP0xchTqylwzj YoRbhRysiYgqc764zTamJKAejyZ4nU4F5jHjcsarOTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=JMLwYz WJFZJjSwbOPBsyhMipS7z6+ryERcPhvkMB9Yw=; b=J/4OyVfJIs1EyhQfQGUxNV RiWiBsaam5RBAvv126k7pvkPUho538rSR+TfyWU8qqvFmtVPvtu2BpA16dTDlQxi E3QuSYXh5l8i/sYqQltgGCayMuhbdz+UAYqneVpaUHpEiBguwpdrgWesrml/UPHl UrMxHiyptb4Mb+tJRw/mdc715p51EZC+r6fpTG017yoWc1DiLbT/xRRpjjKQmhED TU9hNsCCNfwkjJ7A7HRtYkggISe3+bmGWMWzYYE/tCPHPMSpggALwcEKOPoccGNv jsi480v8dQLymjSQtdeZtPFWAO3yzAegUeZm2pMvUbcnHMOidwG6KRDJPhI5ENYA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgeefgddugeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceophgrthhrihgtkhessh htfigtgidrgiihiieqnecukfhppedutdejrddutdejrddukeejrdduuddtnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgrthhrihgtkhessh htfigtgidrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (mobile-107-107-187-110.mycingular.net [107.107.187.110]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 33D4E3065C1C; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:31:46 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Bjorn Ardo , Patrick Williams , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Ard=F6?= , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: slave-eeprom: initialize empty eeprom properly Message-ID: <20200420203146.GC95151@heinlein.lan.stwcx.xyz> References: <20191001164009.21610-1-alpawi@amazon.com> <150599be-9125-4ab9-e2a6-e792b41910e6@axis.com> <20200420164349.GD3721@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200420164349.GD3721@ninjato> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:43:49PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:20:53AM +0200, Bjorn Ardo wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > >=20 > > I sent in another patch earlier that added support for specifying a fil= e in > > devicetree to initilize the eeprom from, corresponding to the case of > > pre-flashed eeprom. Maybe these two patches should be merged so this > > initialization is only done if no file is specified? >=20 > Yes, I agree. >=20 It looks like Bjorn's referenced patches are still unmerged also? --=20 Patrick Williams --4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAl6eBrIACgkQqwNHzC0A wRlalw/9HeoJesi01g2+IOPj7CAKk3h/pTnXSyzqHMkYUgNaTdhy/U+VE9B7ZvJf Hln/gHF0uLaXtTcfXq+ogjL+new9tnJJhQqBEvCAqJ3335agSco1/owDHTCrpKyW y3IGmh4Yls68I5A3YL6OniwqtP7j6qwK7BffAfqGhXiG+5qwLm5hG2Cq1o+nMUm3 xN0y8EB7nmSVbNfUj10aUnXevop7x1pFILzkR299G8XNreI14egQj3TFkmGmRxob Veogw78GcH9D6D334hm0e3lEWElUMGfleuqonRZQdsm0qaZU5veJSb6s/hAy0pW3 PNKufnYjIK2ZStlt6tcJxmsYE2Qc9uiYqFXP41DMAUCB1x5ATAwi82Gq2PDVO9XC NbF8MpC0xHf039YcU7LneoN97ZawVamyEyuoA4JtIan5AwBNrLj4dOJfsfZzFz6l Al9kVVhT4AiR7068nkEhLB1fTlQhSwrrrQhjd6A65nhbS3e3EjNKU53rriBw87KW aOqAM9CykHKf0fZEIks5/yje3fJ9dTQQ+BgLLoAEqzJdkrGB/kuw8NGSgAnithun Nsog+4pV2TkymhO9uwDmQmJAZkSIFWaZoOaYW20xauItZYA76o49tTGZnFhcWjg0 XI3dm8EFa4XZ+lRftlzu7LsmNbcJvcbiBqAJXeplrm3gDMumwwg= =p8Hs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L--