Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp4193288ybz; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:56:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJGeJCiDIFN8JKo/YvdklS4GZV4yMjs0xoj4EvzGq+Aj9SD1VZHlN/oKNwx4TnL90PgOfb/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1a33:: with SMTP id be19mr6392681edb.214.1587430582888; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:56:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587430582; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TyPhCxvI2RptnopNdPE+Uc1teJubpItBHweFfWDy6MSrYOVsrY9/UTqoA47kOvmN7W IvWM9DVaznZLbWvnwq0Jzu94F+f7jHJR6w+Rds9YmFntgBMPnpOZY5ETtrL962HX+XvZ +o96nF62uNS5nlFs4S1gtuxw9qsCfIKlqvQAsDvzo05Q+61Oq2VcEGUAPwwedo5Saf0D Kmsx93DB2Tblq+2MDaVuGLPvLjI/ryNu0RH5EHJcMKv/D+tt/R6KEvR36ZB/5b/ZCYax 8k7sL+uWUagEmC0B4fDWDilfYnJuF+C3+9pwj0iZLVVkWgtKVvIu2+eiC792E5ySrt/b S9ow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Ro/dHqtTvi4HwTnUzYlwB27y32hBd1zFotDqJiiZrYE=; b=Ku76fY/Pg51ZOIHzmHq7VxRd7r2qryKaIuofg7CccYwm9pwa3QlEHS3o7Cz6uDxaDE cRdcisfY6JSp2KKyF+rniEB8e7XgFtpA1u2giDgl3l+CxsItV0NFUe7nnW2hnTBnLlvW I9vChMsC/uAM+MxSiO3crU1EWAx4PGl3Qllh6pkhV7dqBazkTj/WTAUkqTtl+mmZ6uHH SNZFSjXrdKhlZxaqTCrjB+04RhzwPU7kydXpxeEYkAhCneQTBWTVZ/PQzwkXxb8taFj+ kVKAFtzuvV9yVYnrzZtJzr66dzXrJQ//7uVIROnaQxOC0c9xi36YRkNuGs8gE4yknFjf tbHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gh8si570120ejb.301.2020.04.20.17.56.00; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727022AbgDUAwP (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:52:15 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56456 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726017AbgDUAwP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:52:15 -0400 Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD93208E4; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:52:10 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Qais Yousef Cc: Dietmar Eggemann , Patrick Bellasi , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Jonathan Corbet , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Quentin Perret , Valentin Schneider , Pavan Kondeti , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default boost value Message-ID: <20200420205210.7217651c@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200420151941.47ualxul5seqwdgh@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200403123020.13897-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20200414182152.GB20442@darkstar> <54ac2709-54e5-7a33-a6af-0a07e272365c@arm.com> <20200420151941.47ualxul5seqwdgh@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:42 +0100 Qais Yousef wrote: > > root@h960:~# find / -name "*util_clamp*" > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_default_util_clamp_min > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_util_clamp_max > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_util_clamp_min > > > > IMHO, keeping the common 'sched_util_clamp_' would be helpful here, e.g. > > > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_util_clamp_rt_default_min > > All RT related knobs are prefixed with 'sched_rt'. I kept the 'util_clamp_min' > coherent with the current sysctl (sched_util_clamp_min). Quentin suggested > adding 'default' to be more obvious, so I ended up with > > 'sched_rt' + '_default' + '_util_clamp_min'. > > I think this is the logical and most consistent form. Given that Patrick seems > to be okay with the 'default' now, does this look good to you too? There's only two files with "sched_rt" and they are tightly coupled (they define how much an RT task may use the CPU). My question is, is this "sched_rt_default_util_clamp_min" related in any way to those other two files that start with "sched_rt", or is it more related to the files that start with "sched_util_clamp"? If the latter, then I would suggest using "sched_util_clamp_min_rt_default", as it looks to be more related to the "sched_util_clamp_min" than to anything else. -- Steve