Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp169815ybz; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 06:55:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypId9kT7maz67dmcXyveQLf3cVv2y4qS7sP16bV3uje1KxfcDvtox9BrlfZkvxvj4I8TVq5h X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2d5:: with SMTP id b21mr18227859edx.291.1587477306661; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 06:55:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587477306; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ce5GwKie6Jrkp4BTY7Ghj7qt8gxmQ6OE8zPhkfE7R7YPB08e8Le/ajyEifzXdiN7nU vDlTkPhe+k/p6m9WjKXL1upnThAv1yF4TFpfTWnB11CMVOLMwOJnx5JHT0HsD7R28nUW 2VWodvYVynf5g6L6qP5zwChD5it3x5bx7X6lXerK3qUcSm6Y3sMWGu6yzP2TA9INISHx gGhui1Y8cbRxuuZA+3LJX0eQlhWaGUM+HBkxXRGjBh7RLUkzsLnAb3F6V5zhGozEM1go 4W/dMWdWP2+YXjRFwNJ6/Ui4VOtgJZXO66LxnTob8bfGVL7e0uqxpXKGWX3xPbbiJAYd 8VAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id; bh=Ioq3zAZxCSJx3yf/MdWfBcdp4HozBYF1IXwk8O8kpjU=; b=HZL2EwmLeCzb7PrJVPMB5hO20N4uCUYLqCRD7bLnZYekbpl3qA1ELaAk18Xid+wQZY 3VC875bx7XvwnhAHGBMMQN0eQqiI90RekUXD2KEGeY+5G5U27mvrALlRtLAQspStsQMu REwkKZXlMYiFjycxDJXwkkIemNieKxEQDu6AwUQN+1xt1T4FjBBLF7aWK8r6fV9RZPl/ YaoK9Y8VbnaakZEQCvXoj4hmM+ERw5koz9NmisetpbYLRQGYRI2HF00a6Rjt0dK49/ZL Htj8UDpBBipgXjq7fThIo+5DMdP4p6gj+AHnw62zZBdgABzmmJhQ1gfyugNzzaQwolHo UuWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s13si1455891eja.102.2020.04.21.06.54.43; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 06:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729106AbgDUNwp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:52:45 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:34166 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726018AbgDUNwp (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:52:45 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: ezequiel) with ESMTPSA id 6D72F2A174F Message-ID: <93a4663d03046abd984382f898de15ad2a97cd4e.camel@collabora.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: rockchip-vpu: Convert bindings to json-schema From: Ezequiel Garcia To: Hans Verkuil , Johan Jonker , heiko@sntech.de Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:52:33 -0300 In-Reply-To: <30717aac-f589-ffbd-aefb-07c2934f7a2e@xs4all.nl> References: <20200326191343.1989-1-ezequiel@collabora.com> <12f6d7cf-6af6-4f54-3188-65e73b703a72@gmail.com> <9328212d-139f-6a0e-7d0c-3a5529a392f2@gmail.com> <30717aac-f589-ffbd-aefb-07c2934f7a2e@xs4all.nl> Organization: Collabora Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.0-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 15:44 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 21/04/2020 15:19, Johan Jonker wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Question for the media maintainers Hans & Co. : > > > > What's nxp,imx8mq-vpu.yaml doing under rga? > > Why is rockchip-vpu.yaml inserted under rga instead of vpu? > > That's clearly wrong. Probably my fault when trying to resolve > a conflict. > > Ezequiel, can you make a patch fixing this? It's probably a good > idea if you double-check these entries to make sure I didn't inadvertently > introduce more mistakes. > Sure, no worries. Ezequiel