Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:52:25 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] docs: RCU: RTFP: fix bibtex entries
Message-ID: <20200421175225.GA32083@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <cover.1587488137.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
 <3cc10823634f12c3d3c44ee03f73b7aaa347df63.1587488137.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
 <20200421174329.GR17661@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200421174329.GR17661@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:43:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:04:08PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > There are several troubles at the bibtex entries with
> > prevent them to be processed by LaTeX:
> > 
> > - On LaTeX, comment lines start with '%', but here, comments
> >   are starting with "#";
> > - Underlines should be escaped.
> > - While the best would be to use \url{} for all URL entries,
> >   let's do it at least for a couple that would otherwise
> >   produce errors on LaTeX.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> 
> Another approach might be just to link to a public repo containing
> cleaned-up versions of these bibliography entries:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/perfbook.git/tree/bib/RCU.bib
> 
> That would have the advantage of keeping this information in only one
> place, and reducing the number of updates required.
> 
> Thoughts?

OK, I should have read the next patch in the series, where you convert
into a Sphinx-compatible bibliography.  Except that you had to convert
the bibtex entries by hand to produce the Sphinx-compatible entries?
That will get a bit ugly when it comes time to add more entries.

Or was the conversion of bibliography entries automated?

							Thanx, Paul

> > ---
> >  Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt | 98 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt
> > index 9bccf16736f7..6b93fbbfad19 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt
> > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ Bibtex Entries
> >  	Use garbage collector to clean up data after everyone is done with it.
> >  	.
> >  	Oldest use of something vaguely resembling RCU that I have found.
> > -	http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=320619&dl=GUIDE,
> > +	\url{http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=320619&dl=GUIDE},
> >  	[Viewed December 3, 2007]
> >  }
> >  }
> > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ for Programming Languages and Operating Systems}"
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > -# Was Adams91, see also syncrefs.bib.
> > +% Was Adams91, see also syncrefs.bib.
> >  @Book{Andrews91textbook
> >  ,Author="Gregory R. Andrews"
> >  ,title="Concurrent Programming, Principles, and Practices"
> > @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ Operating System Design and Implementation}"
> >  	Use of RCU-like facility in K42/Tornado.  Another independent
> >  	invention of RCU.
> >  	See especially pages 7-9 (Section 5).
> > -	http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi99/full_papers/gamsa/gamsa.pdf
> > +	\url{http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi99/full_papers/gamsa/gamsa.pdf}
> >  	[Viewed August 30, 2006]
> >  }
> >  }
> > @@ -1037,10 +1037,10 @@ Add per-cpu batch counter"
> >  	RCU runs reasonably on a 512-CPU SGI using Manfred Spraul's patches,
> >  	which may be found at:
> >  	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/20/49 (split vars into cachelines)
> > -	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/22/114 (cpu_quiet() patch)
> > +	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/22/114 (cpu\_quiet() patch)
> >  	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/24 (0/5)
> >  	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/23 (1/5)
> > -		https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/265 (works for Jack)
> > +	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/265 (works for Jack)
> >  	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/20 (2/5)
> >  	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/22 (3/5)
> >  	https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/19 (4/5)
> > @@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ Oregon Health and Sciences University"
> >  \url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/6/237}
> >  [Viewed June 8, 2010]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Introduce rcu_dereference().
> > +	Introduce rcu\_dereference().
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ Oregon Health and Sciences University"
> >  \url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/30/87}
> >  [Viewed February 17, 2005]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Uses active code in rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() to
> > +	Uses active code in rcu\_read\_lock() and rcu\_read\_unlock() to
> >  	make RCU happen, allowing RCU to function on CPUs that do not
> >  	receive a scheduling-clock interrupt.
> >  }
> > @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ Oregon Health and Sciences University"
> >  ,month="October"
> >  ,year="2004"
> >  ,note="Available:
> > -\url{http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~tomhart/masters_thesis.html}
> > +\url{http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~tomhart/masters\_thesis.html}
> >  [Viewed October 15, 2004]"
> >  ,annotation={
> >  	Proposes comparing RCU to lock-free methods for the Linux kernel.
> > @@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ Oregon Health and Sciences University"
> >  \url{http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=109395731700004&r=1&w=2}
> >  [Viewed October 18, 2004]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Srivatsa's RCU patch for tcp_ehash lookup.
> > +	Srivatsa's RCU patch for tcp\_ehash lookup.
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1182,14 +1182,14 @@ Oregon Health and Sciences University"
> >  
> >  @unpublished{PaulEMcKenney2004rcu:assign:pointer
> >  ,Author="Paul E. McKenney"
> > -,Title="{[PATCH 1/3] RCU: \url{rcu_assign_pointer()} removal of memory barriers}"
> > +,Title="{[PATCH 1/3] RCU: \url{rcu\_assign\_pointer()} removal of memory barriers}"
> >  ,month="October"
> >  ,year="2004"
> >  ,note="Available:
> >  \url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/23/241}
> >  [Viewed June 8, 2010]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Introduce rcu_assign_pointer().
> > +	Introduce rcu\_assign\_pointer().
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ Data Structures"
> >  
> >  @unpublished{JonCorbet2005DeprecateSyncKernel
> >  ,Author="Jonathan Corbet"
> > -,Title="API change: synchronize_kernel() deprecated"
> > +,Title="API change: synchronize\_kernel() deprecated"
> >  ,month="May"
> >  ,day="3"
> >  ,year="2005"
> > @@ -1291,8 +1291,8 @@ Data Structures"
> >  \url{http://lwn.net/Articles/134484/}
> >  [Viewed May 3, 2005]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Jon Corbet describes deprecation of synchronize_kernel()
> > -	in favor of synchronize_rcu() and synchronize_sched().
> > +	Jon Corbet describes deprecation of synchronize\_kernel()
> > +	in favor of synchronize\_rcu() and synchronize\_sched().
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ Data Structures"
> >  [Viewed May 13, 2005]"
> >  ,annotation={
> >  	First publication of working lock-based deferred free patches
> > -	for the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT environment.
> > +	for the CONFIG\_PREEMPT\_RT environment.
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ Canis Rufus and Zoicon5 and Anome and Hal Eisen"
> >  ,Year="2006"
> >  ,pages="v2 249-254"
> >  ,note="Available:
> > -\url{http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/view_abstract.php?content_key=184}
> > +\url{http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/view\_abstract.php?content\_key=184}
> >  [Viewed January 11, 2009]"
> >  ,annotation={
> >  	Uses RCU-protected radix tree for a lockless page cache.
> > @@ -1606,8 +1606,8 @@ Revised:
> >  
> >  @unpublished{JensAxboe2006SlowSRCU
> >  ,Author="Jens Axboe"
> > -,Title="Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark \url{cpufreq_tsc()} as
> > -\url{core_initcall_sync}"
> > +,Title="Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark \url{cpufreq\_tsc()} as
> > +\url{core\_initcall\_sync}"
> >  ,month="November"
> >  ,year="2006"
> >  ,day=17
> > @@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ Revised:
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > -# CoreyMinyard2007list_splice_rcu
> > +% CoreyMinyard2007list_splice_rcu
> >  @unpublished{CoreyMinyard2007list:splice:rcu
> >  ,Author="Corey Minyard and Paul E. McKenney"
> >  ,Title="{[PATCH]} add an {RCU} version of list splicing"
> > @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ Revised:
> >  \url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/3/112}
> >  [Viewed May 28, 2007]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Patch for list_splice_rcu().
> > +	Patch for list\_splice\_rcu().
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1726,7 +1726,7 @@ Revised:
> >  \url{http://lwn.net/Articles/217484/}
> >  [Viewed November 22, 2007]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	LWN article introducing the rcu_barrier() primitive.
> > +	LWN article introducing the rcu\_barrier() primitive.
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@ Revised:
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > -# MathieuDesnoyers2007call_rcu_schedNeeded
> > +% MathieuDesnoyers2007call_rcu_schedNeeded
> >  @unpublished{MathieuDesnoyers2007call:rcu:schedNeeded
> >  ,Author="Mathieu Desnoyers"
> >  ,Title="Re: [patch 1/2] {Linux} Kernel Markers - Support Multiple Probes"
> > @@ -1936,18 +1936,18 @@ Revised:
> >  \url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/244}
> >  [Viewed March 27, 2008]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Request for call_rcu_sched() and rcu_barrier_sched().
> > +	Request for call\_rcu\_sched() and rcu\_barrier\_sched().
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> >  
> > -########################################################################
> > -#
> > -#	"What is RCU?" LWN series.
> > -#
> > -#	http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/ (What is RCU, Fundamentally?)
> > -#	http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/ (What is RCU's Usage?)
> > -#	http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/ (What is RCU's API?)
> > +%#######################################################################
> > +%
> > +%	"What is RCU?" LWN series.
> > +%
> > +%	http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/ (What is RCU, Fundamentally?)
> > +%	http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/ (What is RCU's Usage?)
> > +%	http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/ (What is RCU's API?)
> >  
> >  @unpublished{PaulEMcKenney2007WhatIsRCUFundamentally
> >  ,Author="Paul E. McKenney and Jonathan Walpole"
> > @@ -2000,10 +2000,10 @@ Revised:
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > -#
> > -#	"What is RCU?" LWN series.
> > -#
> > -########################################################################
> > +%
> > +%	"What is RCU?" LWN series.
> > +%
> > +%#######################################################################
> >  
> >  
> >  @unpublished{SteveRostedt2008dyntickRCUpatch
> > @@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,annotation={
> >  	Updated RCU classic algorithm.  Introduced multi-tailed list
> >  	for RCU callbacks and also pulling common code into
> > -	__call_rcu().
> > +	\_\_call\_rcu().
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2145,7 +2145,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > -# Was PaulEMcKenney2011cyclicRCU
> > +% Was PaulEMcKenney2011cyclicRCU
> >  @techreport{PaulEMcKenney2008cyclicRCU
> >  ,author="Paul E. McKenney"
> >  ,title="Efficient Support of Consistent Cyclic Search With Read-Copy Update"
> > @@ -2353,7 +2353,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  \url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/18/129}
> >  [Viewed December 29, 2009]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Mathieu proposed defer_rcu() with fixed-size per-thread pool
> > +	Mathieu proposed defer\_rcu() with fixed-size per-thread pool
> >  	of RCU callbacks.
> >  }
> >  }
> > @@ -2413,8 +2413,8 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  \url{http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/SimplicityThruOptimization.2010.01.21f.pdf}
> >  [Viewed October 10, 2010]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	TREE_PREEMPT_RCU optimizations greatly simplified the old
> > -	PREEMPT_RCU implementation.
> > +	TREE\_PREEMPT\_RCU optimizations greatly simplified the old
> > +	PREEMPT\_RCU implementation.
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2426,7 +2426,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,day="1"
> >  ,note="\url{https://lwn.net/Articles/371986/}"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, or at least an early version.
> > +	CONFIG\_PROVE\_RCU, or at least an early version.
> >  	[Viewed June 4, 2010]
> >  }
> >  }
> > @@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  \url{http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/153338}
> >  [Viewed June 9, 2014]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Use a pair of list_head structures to support RCU-protected
> > +	Use a pair of list\_head structures to support RCU-protected
> >  	resizable hash tables.
> >  }
> >  }
> > @@ -2466,7 +2466,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,year="2010"
> >  ,annotation={
> >  	Data-race detector incorporating RCU.
> > -	http://www.filesystems.org/docs/abhinav-thesis/abhinav_thesis.pdf
> > +	\url{http://www.filesystems.org/docs/abhinav-thesis/abhinav_thesis.pdf}
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2528,7 +2528,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  	nice about it is that it actually improves performance a lot even for
> >  	single-threaded loads (on an SMP kernel), because it gets rid of some
> >  	of the most expensive parts of path component lookup, which was the
> > -	d_lock on every component lookup. So I'm seeing improvements of 30-50%
> > +	d\_lock on every component lookup. So I'm seeing improvements of 30-50%
> >  	on some seriously pathname-lookup intensive loads."
> >  }
> >  }
> > @@ -2551,7 +2551,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,location = {Berkeley, CA}
> >  ,pages = {1--6}
> >  ,numpages = {6}
> > -,url = {http://www.usenix.org/event/hotpar11/tech/final_files/Howard.pdf}
> > +,url = {http://www.usenix.org/event/hotpar11/tech/final\_files/Howard.pdf}
> >  ,publisher = {USENIX Association}
> >  ,address = {Berkeley, CA, USA}
> >  }
> > @@ -2581,7 +2581,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,year = {2011}
> >  ,pages = {145--158}
> >  ,numpages = {14}
> > -,url={http://www.usenix.org/event/atc11/tech/final_files/Triplett.pdf}
> > +,url={http://www.usenix.org/event/atc11/tech/final\_files/Triplett.pdf}
> >  ,publisher = {The USENIX Association}
> >  ,address = {Portland, OR USA}
> >  }
> > @@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  \url{http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/RCUdynticks.2012.02.15b.pdf}
> >  [Viewed March 1, 2012]"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	RCU_FAST_NO_HZ, round 2.
> > +	RCU\_FAST\_NO\_HZ, round 2.
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2719,7 +2719,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,note="\url{http://lwn.net/Articles/508991/}"
> >  ,annotation={
> >  	A couple of simple specific compiler optimizations that motivate
> > -	ACCESS_ONCE().
> > +	ACCESS\_ONCE().
> >  }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2741,7 +2741,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,month="September"
> >  ,day="17"
> >  ,year="2012"
> > -,url=http://rdrop.com/users/paulmck/techreports/survey.2012.09.17a.pdf
> > +,url={http://rdrop.com/users/paulmck/techreports/survey.2012.09.17a.pdf}
> >  ,note="Technical report paulmck.2012.09.17"
> >  ,annotation={
> >  	Overview of the first variant of no-CBs CPUs for RCU.
> > @@ -2807,6 +2807,6 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!"
> >  ,year="2013"
> >  ,note="\url{http://lwn.net/Articles/541037/}"
> >  ,annotation={
> > -	Getting rid of TINY_PREEMPT_RCU.
> > +	Getting rid of TINY\_PREEMPT\_RCU.
> >  }
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.25.2
> >