Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:20:58 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc:     Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, sunhaoyl@outlook.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf.c: allocate initialized memory in
 fill_thread_core_info()
Message-ID: <202004211320.C2B3840@keescook>
References: <20200419100848.63472-1-glider@google.com>
 <20200420153352.6682533e794f591dae7aafbc@linux-foundation.org>
 <202004201540.01C8F82B@keescook>
 <20200421034249.GB23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CAG_fn=X_eQ4G-0+oAO_q+_zRnkfMf4uhfMcnoYt4i1N_noKgdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG48ez1u9=Uqcx2dH=7xea1R+WpnL239DSoVHLwV09=FxZUevQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6eb0a398097d16f7247accdfa9c21c1da90e0461.camel@intel.com>
 <CAG48ez0rWH+kQVFVwwrZHqbL5G5H7CEJ-_xYsF15Wo2RzrqDfg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez0rWH+kQVFVwwrZHqbL5G5H7CEJ-_xYsF15Wo2RzrqDfg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:16:25PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:05 PM Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 17:09 +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > +x86 folks
> > >
> > > (rest of thread is on lore
> > > <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200419100848.63472-1-glider@google.com/>;,
> > > with original bug report on github
> > > <https://github.com/google/kmsan/issues/76>;)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:54 PM Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:42 AM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:41:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:33:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 12:08:48 +0200 glider@google.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > KMSAN reported uninitialized data being written to disk when dumping
> > > > > > > > core. As a result, several kilobytes of kmalloc memory may be written to
> > > > > > > > the core file and then read by a non-privileged user.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ewww. That's been there for 12 years. Did something change in
> > > > > > regset_size() or regset->get()? Do you know what leaves the hole?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not lately and I would also like to hear the details; which regset it is?
> > > > > Should be reasonably easy to find - just memset() the damn thing to something
> > > > > recognizable, do whatever triggers that KMSAN report and look at that
> > > > > resulting coredump.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Seems to be REGSET_XSTATE filled by xstateregs_get().
> > > > Is there a ptrace interface also using that function?
> > >
> > > It looks to me like the problem KMSAN found is that
> > > copy_xstate_to_kernel() will not fill out memory for unused xstates? I
> > > think this may have been introduced by commit 91c3dba7dbc1
> > > ("x86/fpu/xstate: Fix PTRACE frames for XSAVES", introduced in v4.8).
> > >
> > > There seem to be no other functions that reach that path other than
> > > coredumping; I think the correct fix would be to change
> > > copy_xstate_to_kernel() to always fully initialize the output buffer.
> >
> > Yes, that makes sense.  On the other hand, the kzalloc() fix prevents potential
> > similar problems for other regsets.
> 
> I don't really have anything against using kzalloc() there; but in my
> opinion that's not a fix, that's hardening. The real problem, in my
> opinion, is that regset->get() claims to have filled out a buffer
> without actually having done so; and if someone happens to add another
> caller to that thing in the future, I don't want them to run into
> exactly the same problem again.

Right -- we should fix both.

-- 
Kees Cook