Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200420190916.GA11695@gmail.com> <CAHk-=wiejBvKnrDysDva=DNFgyX02TZred_JMjzUnjFgVOUtOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-5=fVhWREzzjnXH4j+dcnP-GbSMnT_07qVrZM8huAhx6wtVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=wifecOQcL6vbL0uOY68jH4i3nBCksmc+As9hrUm_hjw1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wifecOQcL6vbL0uOY68jH4i3nBCksmc+As9hrUm_hjw1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 00:52:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CANiq72n2T0UCdjb923LThts-3js8LiDTqFHB-PK3SqeG3xwY=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] clang-format for v5.7-rc3
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:17 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Well, not really. I _did_ check the commit message. It says nothing
> very useful at all, in that the kernel doesn't use C++ (aside from a
> couple of clang tests)

Apart from what Ian said, one of those is tools/perf/util/c++/clang.{h,cpp}
which use `namespace perf` (with non-indented contents), which is why
I mentioned in the PR email that the change aligns clang-format to the
current usage.

But yeah, perhaps I should have edited the commit message rather than
say it in the email in passing.

Cheers,
Miguel