Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp292943ybz; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:13:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLhfH5Ds58aoT6jR9KGlTGF88MCIfmEZLREUzQ74J5IGwnaPzOxGDy4s1LC2CDehqHb1MhV X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:17e3:: with SMTP id t3mr21938500edy.203.1587528809665; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:13:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587528809; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L4wik3Q74Pa9AH6EqNBenY/Hlp19uy42aBaG+07mGz3cGqvpRqHFcslpY4Obbt0Lu2 vRwFRENRhfmsfzjSuj0k3hL/1gEe6NVMqO1SvLSoLnDdeHmIA77bsgN8s70Yfnmhh5xX Ju7Ueht8On9dFK2P94ss9eMmPsnlhIwe/2rhPuvr32+2mHEVhoiU36c/Y/JW6IOY7Ir2 Mtz282a5fKrzQk62T+cLog0NFxbdZS27p4eyS1/jQCrBkJu37EQujJw8syd2dsDlhurZ J+sn03WiPPDNHol1vwhwM32nF5QUc9yFO9hU4oxWbqnAWn/w/0YIGmG4tXZhjTaFiZDA EtVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=p14YC0BgE+eyGQNb/ktSuSlgKaNSluUCJwQSAUv3DdA=; b=bUvk9I8phGI4jRqOiQ6bigj0WCLSkVPhq9ZhKX/f7rQVJBXAAKN9+uBrntrR1dErjQ rumu6LfX8Vr/uy5+sO4rHURxbZJ7u7TPof9acEQBuzw/dR3EPsc6FZcnNRmqU6iVFVrD 3owYViYFdDTy7qQX2gkBldiEqWEYwAXrKaDTCbhATIZFf6gO/HgBiKyahZl/Br1JYLIf KzWYwLjZJcYyGjweP2yb2N/0ROfpmeIEP3hkql3/KU8/0eIMf9HLaYZzWZvNfKxkkkGf LAJ7VLeMMtOhnpEL2ivQydSScUA4r8jLKErbYrRvWZ0tC6VB1fn+ntMqdUw+O4+JykWL XNQA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c5si2776067ejr.178.2020.04.21.21.13.06; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726499AbgDVELx (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 00:11:53 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60088 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726466AbgDVELw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 00:11:52 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850FFADE1; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:11:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Davidlohr Bueso To: tglx@linutronix.de, pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, will@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: [PATCH 3/5] rcuwait: Introduce prepare_to and finish_rcuwait Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:07:37 -0700 Message-Id: <20200422040739.18601-4-dave@stgolabs.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 In-Reply-To: <20200422040739.18601-1-dave@stgolabs.net> References: <20200422040739.18601-1-dave@stgolabs.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This allows further flexibility for some callers to implement ad-hoc versions of the generic rcuwait_wait_event(). For example, kvm will need this to maintain tracing semantics. The naming is of course similar to what waitqueue apis offer. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso --- include/linux/rcuwait.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcuwait.h b/include/linux/rcuwait.h index 6ebb23258a27..0c6a3d0d25ab 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcuwait.h +++ b/include/linux/rcuwait.h @@ -29,12 +29,25 @@ extern int rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w); /* * The caller is responsible for locking around rcuwait_wait_event(), - * such that writes to @task are properly serialized. + * and prepare_to_rcuwait() such that writes to @task are properly + * serialized. */ + +static inline void prepare_to_rcuwait(struct rcuwait *w) +{ + rcu_assign_pointer(w->task, current); +} + +static inline void finish_rcuwait(struct rcuwait *w) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(w->task, NULL); + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); +} + #define rcuwait_wait_event(w, condition, state) \ ({ \ int __ret = 0; \ - rcu_assign_pointer((w)->task, current); \ + prepare_to_rcuwait(w); \ for (;;) { \ /* \ * Implicit barrier (A) pairs with (B) in \ @@ -51,9 +64,7 @@ extern int rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w); \ schedule(); \ } \ - \ - WRITE_ONCE((w)->task, NULL); \ - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); \ + finish_rcuwait(w); \ __ret; \ }) -- 2.16.4