Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1587369582-3882-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
 <1587369582-3882-4-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <20200422074423.GA12288@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200422074423.GA12288@infradead.org>
From:   Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:55:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4MOzTU2BLffuVm_CHbWs3SJTcCdhEGQyfR3FsCgoiG1Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/migrate: separate PageHighMem() and
 PageHighMemZone() use case
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

2020=EB=85=84 4=EC=9B=94 22=EC=9D=BC (=EC=88=98) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 4:44, C=
hristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1:
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 04:59:35PM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >
> > Until now, PageHighMem() is used for two different cases. One is to che=
ck
> > if there is a direct mapping for this page or not. The other is to chec=
k
> > the zone of this page, that is, weather it is the highmem type zone or =
not.
> >
> > Now, we have separate functions, PageHighMem() and PageHighMemZone() fo=
r
> > each cases. Use appropriate one.
> >
> > Note that there are some rules to determine the proper macro.
> >
> > 1. If PageHighMem() is called for checking if the direct mapping exists
> > or not, use PageHighMem().
> > 2. If PageHighMem() is used to predict the previous gfp_flags for
> > this page, use PageHighMemZone(). The zone of the page is related to
> > the gfp_flags.
> > 3. If purpose of calling PageHighMem() is to count highmem page and
> > to interact with the system by using this count, use PageHighMemZone().
> > This counter is usually used to calculate the available memory for an
> > kernel allocation and pages on the highmem zone cannot be available
> > for an kernel allocation.
> > 4. Otherwise, use PageHighMemZone(). It's safe since it's implementatio=
n
> > is just copy of the previous PageHighMem() implementation and won't
> > be changed.
> >
> > I apply the rule #2 for this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/migrate.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > index 3e546cb..9a57766 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline struct page *new_page_nodemask(struct p=
age *page,
> >               order =3D HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
> >       }
> >
> > -     if (PageHighMem(page) || (zone_idx(page_zone(page)) =3D=3D ZONE_M=
OVABLE))
> > +     if (PageHighMemZone(page) || zone_idx(page_zone(page)) =3D=3D ZON=
E_MOVABLE)
> >               gfp_mask |=3D __GFP_HIGHMEM;
>
> I think this would be much cleaner if you open coded PageHighMemZone
> here.
>
> E.g.
>
>         int zone =3D page_zone(page);
>
>         if (is_highmem_idx(zone) || zone_idx(zone) =3D=3D ZONE_MOVABLE)

Okay. I will use open code here to make two condition checks similar form.

Thanks.