Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.6 147/166] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Fix overflow checks
Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:57:54 +0200
Message-Id: <20200422095104.361727106@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200422095047.669225321@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20200422095047.669225321@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

commit d0802dc411f469569a537283b6f3833af47aece9 upstream.

Commit f949a12fd697 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing
set_rxnfc") tried to fix the some user controlled buffer overflows in
bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_set() and bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_del() but the fix was using
CFP_NUM_RULES, which while it is correct not to overflow the bitmaps, is
not representative of what the device actually supports. Correct that by
using bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size() instead.

The latter subtracts the number of rules by 1, so change the checks from
greater than or equal to greater than accordingly.

Fixes: f949a12fd697 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing set_rxnfc")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c
@@ -882,17 +882,14 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_set(struct d
 	     fs->m_ext.data[1]))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY && fs->location >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
+	    fs->location > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
 	    test_bit(fs->location, priv->cfp.used))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	if (fs->location != RX_CLS_LOC_ANY &&
-	    fs->location > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	ret = bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_cmp(priv, port, fs);
 	if (ret == 0)
 		return -EEXIST;
@@ -973,7 +970,7 @@ static int bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_del(struct b
 	struct cfp_rule *rule;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (loc >= CFP_NUM_RULES)
+	if (loc > bcm_sf2_cfp_rule_size(priv))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* Refuse deleting unused rules, and those that are not unique since