Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751422AbWCDHf4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751422AbWCDHf4 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 4 Mar 2006 02:35:56 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751494AbWCDHf4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 4 Mar 2006 02:35:56 -0500
Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:38075 "HELO xenotime.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751422AbWCDHfz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 4 Mar 2006 02:35:55 -0500
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:37:16 -0800
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: hare@suse.de, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
Message-Id: <20060303233716.67ffaff6.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060228172542.GF24981@suse.de>
References: <44045FB1.5040408@suse.de>
	<440468DB.5060605@pobox.com>
	<20060228151928.GC24981@suse.de>
	<44046AC2.1060002@pobox.com>
	<20060228152847.GE24981@suse.de>
	<44046DC3.4060508@pobox.com>
	<440472F6.6090905@suse.de>
	<20060228172542.GF24981@suse.de>
Organization: YPO4
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.2 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1244
Lines: 35

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:25:43 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 28 2006, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >> I'm sure Hannes will regenerate against upstream as well if necessary,
> > >> however that depends on when this should be applied.
> > > 
> > > It's far too late and too intrusive for 2.6.16-rc.
> > > 
> > > It's #upstream or <null>.
> > > 
> > Calm down. Of course I will regenerate is against #upstream.
> > In fact, I've done so initially but wasn't sure what the status of
> > libata-dev is. So I've diffed it against linux-git instead.
> > 
> > Updated patch to follow.
> 
> Thanks Hannes. I wasn't so much worried about it going directly in (I
> have no problem waiting), just that there seemed to be some disagreement
> on where suspend is at and what we can "support".

Hi Hannes,

Did you ever send the updated patch?  I need it to use with the
rest of the ata-acpi objects patchset for #upstream (actually for -mm).

Thanks,
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/