Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S278808AbRJVN4O>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:56:14 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S278810AbRJVN4F>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:56:05 -0400
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:3594 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S278808AbRJVN4C>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:56:02 -0400
Subject: Re: VM
To: mbabcock@fibrespeed.net (Michael T. Babcock)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:02:49 +0100 (BST)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel)
In-Reply-To: <3BD420ED.4090508@fibrespeed.net> from "Michael T. Babcock" at Oct 22, 2001 09:36:45 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15vffF-00023N-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> I have never done this comparison myself, but I was wondering how ugly 
> it would be if stable versions of Andrea's and Rik's VMs were both 
> available in your/Linus' kernel as compile-time options.  Assuming that 
> each provides better performance under certain conditions, wouldn't 

Too ugly for words.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/