Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp939687ybz; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ16Sap62VY0yFKelvOWaVxDdqFrSdv1/Rs2e/ZGHxEENQ6V/Gft3vCuVJpXlAp+8zxdU1f X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2711:: with SMTP id w17mr26625110ejk.116.1587576940184; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587576940; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e8GzITvDfQNeGitMnNoZPXzs3uEPmCilYL+gttg0mc32v3JlUkElipbQAW2PT6lZzi rv5EvfnORpvpXRNFHDSiLUxDuAwaYRY+rAff140b4lDhR3DqY9Z85GNTVTJp24N5PHbj I6DfpQ1mtrd7gs++p+GSB9GFtaTB9vwD8WLTbSmQk0JtsViBVGigC11WWs4C/OT8NzDO f898pcC72NA+v5F0ZhNhp4sA78ZgeSiGlUhgo1V7KSHU/DoA17BiIBGzOht6ZCayk3XE rerQj+CdiDAoqS5fHPfDusZl1G/QRDc/5aq7wz1WFVPVZw31AWT6xEXAOkWbhC00g0Xq VmCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=i/+iDJDPriHhGwMrPdZIol4dMkbTnv+nKftyoIsK8TU=; b=BlAvTjR0Swyk9jiuGlaA0tsu0eV/ayZ2hA9Lr+DgcJ3ql8Cv8bofV1n7PkWGjfwiYf 4cxOqIt6dGTT9eH+YbTmZSCJcSyeMhgWa/BzQXkt48KskmI0IaGriftYfe7cuIhCiKYC MMIStif+89Loa3xe1bFczvONNZrma3vrrsfGxai8np/wZjtPfXNAegjwlZZnxBs1BgTr VPu1ht4OnFfVoltHuqj+6wj4/ACfNqBU4RBCT/6aFjeaKguPvD1q5fXzeatQ7jm8shfn K5f0fzLEvRcMrXtpHNOb53dQuvSY64aNmLhZ+xKNQ6ehJbGSq6rJWcLVY32g4vozt4UQ H0Bw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=monom.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k11si3856169edx.311.2020.04.22.10.35.11; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=monom.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726402AbgDVReF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:34:05 -0400 Received: from mail.monom.org ([188.138.9.77]:46254 "EHLO mail.monom.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726006AbgDVReE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:34:04 -0400 Received: from mail.monom.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter.mynetwork.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8E750047C; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:33:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.monom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (b9168f17.cgn.dg-w.de [185.22.143.23]) by mail.monom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8291B50029E; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:33:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:33:59 +0200 From: Daniel Wagner To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.6.4-rt3 Message-ID: <20200422173359.inlikfugjzsjyyp6@beryllium.lan> References: <20200416164510.kbrklqahdng5uhij@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200416164510.kbrklqahdng5uhij@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sebastian, On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 06:45:10PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I'm pleased to announce the v5.6.4-rt3 patch set. Finally solved my lab setup issue (NFS wants to use TCP per default now) and all looks good. The fallout on rt-tests-migrate was a configuration bug on my side. All rt-tests work and pass on my three system (Beaglebone Black 32bit, RPi3 64bit and old x86_64 Core2 Duo CPU E8400 box in 64bit mode). The only thing I've observed was higher latency numbers in sigwaittest but that could be anything. Thanks, Daniel