Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp992063ybz; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:33:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIuFr14FxLg0YRkoirYbZHg+/LYE4hKdPeiU9pQrw/qgSHUzStC8WACjUY4LRkMq01+HRXf X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1496:: with SMTP id e22mr24361179edv.301.1587580415418; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:33:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587580415; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tGnTh9q8DAfFKKLeANgHK1GSlFVqP72k8oZozZ57VgP6k/yOCu+JilpO7nFU8vhRb8 lR7tExwSGJwcwqWilMtIGMv8UVcxxymXiaN+8d3CMHNV041UhNVh2cQUXW1dQP6BY52+ qvYO71KfF44c7uIxI3KxR5LOWoV+jYJu8g40PjVxtKrCeL87BV3Jln+BUCwTXhsorWIQ iNrFDCq+sKGJA2aBhuXYJsQ+C7iVO1WoVcwsBRjXRAeNaXyqnT6d56HuMsHcyY4AGz5n u70dH4sDeVzgVIJrH+5G+sjmvMUE+zSbN4tXwsTHuKDCnenZ667sk73s566iVs/kvt1X vxVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ZZwVHPk4FqlvB8pTdDUWwueWJzAvdm1XzgyJLqGlm8k=; b=HUg68OZiUJEz2G9fhBAFo0vu7yT6hOoL4HnBjxh0owqoUfb2tuZyMXWxQss+KelhaT hqGZfUA0fKsDUqz8+6QEL5vjUy3xz/MJHOxcTNuXVd6HNBpHKVCe3KUG3cn1TPiOg8JE 6UYQJlW8HLivXGmkYRY2NltUoQ5jAIphW59GeVfjikRQTFwxC57vwE0cLq7jqsmijLky IN/eUBST1iXsHweUDVhYiRCX/+ILl9MCTOq7s0fsTh02ra5HVKZNsGwJN8jD0bHuPU6r HCphvAnriXIwqQJIjFI2mkjcSMNVA9JNQaTTuUsSf6kP7zvTfng26KdKULVXrKat0Bk0 sMkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=monom.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c22si37748eja.230.2020.04.22.11.33.01; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=monom.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726363AbgDVSbP (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:31:15 -0400 Received: from mail.monom.org ([188.138.9.77]:46460 "EHLO mail.monom.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725648AbgDVSbP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:31:15 -0400 Received: from mail.monom.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter.mynetwork.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A26B50047C; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:31:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.monom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (b9168f17.cgn.dg-w.de [185.22.143.23]) by mail.monom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D833A50029E; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:31:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:31:12 +0200 From: Daniel Wagner To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.6.4-rt3 Message-ID: <20200422183112.nfbxob7gv33fsqgp@beryllium.lan> References: <20200416164510.kbrklqahdng5uhij@linutronix.de> <20200422173359.inlikfugjzsjyyp6@beryllium.lan> <20200422181232.a33sfm6udmy2zcvy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200422181232.a33sfm6udmy2zcvy@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:12:32PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-04-22 19:33:59 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > Hi Daniel, > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 06:45:10PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > I'm pleased to announce the v5.6.4-rt3 patch set. > > > > Finally solved my lab setup issue (NFS wants to use TCP per default now) and > > all looks good. The fallout on rt-tests-migrate was a configuration bug on my > > side. All rt-tests work and pass on my three system (Beaglebone Black 32bit, > > RPi3 64bit and old x86_64 Core2 Duo CPU E8400 box in 64bit mode). > > So there is no backtrace of any kind in any configuration (bug or no > bug)? Correct, all tests pass and from a quick glance there are no backtraces in the logs. IIRC, lava detects warnings and backtraces in the logs and marks them as error. v5.6.4-rt seems to be in a good shape as far my quick tests tell me.