Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1670656ybz; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:32:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIhxzMTFsjkX01yaPLLmJknPtvWBbR4VJ9cz/7wZ9KbGWaJ9kZWytAfUTg2q8QodV6B5B2V X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b7da:: with SMTP id fy26mr2114659ejb.327.1587637957159; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:32:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587637957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L30aABSvIFsuqRHelh2NKufVkMaCFEzld0vFVM4Gd5wPykTIH2CZ232/RsGR0UmM0+ 7MBSC9Ezr3qn4sRhW+jTHYRQ5eVT3ZO0hkPq6pQTyhqxXoTDq1qhpxHGyichmbOpckob Jx3Va3MZag0FTOola4X4boNPZzgEjT5ysQ8OEJAfcMfVpRH+w9aGYqEWbJOb0UcQQMzW zsGjmT8c1SGv4eCsA8jI7L3c9vApZIUJMbMv9VBM9awTpo2m4VcTIxmSYp6VWW+0ZKEY isaXQ9hCDvAMQAE+eCiXn9E1ASDW2vLzhmsdjFtWZbs3urpJiAoiQAQXsNNz5QqCUckl ISUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=v9AXR8INu2V1rXzlem4kdzH7dLRNBQB5Vc6BL374Yjc=; b=LKJ62VHh9UcC+RH+CbqXv1neWCRFaxdQrPcswZu97oSOEDFfhREs8lz98VoSbNMQeX 41NWMtjyztmFVWfoUTPe3EBmSBkmXtkc+Z+XvB1eMmRq5KIdKdkE4E5+oNtBfQ29DxDp LC9uolAYOSKAZpLAn3/PGfGKC3PZZBakKZqhfAIkFc1VCuDAfItb5p1FfcQ0al49AlQ6 R68IN4XJmpI93Gwr+ckzLeUlKdsfWPFzrKZbXaie6UW+OwvPtL5afLXyHZtYiAsRlxC8 VLs8En+bDkczWaG2HqEPsSWJwuQg2luWk3f84Bm+r5PbkXLiR6C8d6CGyaEir+7JkWed 4r2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GhZ71I2h; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f4si1115879ejd.83.2020.04.23.03.32.12; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GhZ71I2h; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727001AbgDWK35 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:29:57 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:27272 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727014AbgDWK34 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:29:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587637795; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v9AXR8INu2V1rXzlem4kdzH7dLRNBQB5Vc6BL374Yjc=; b=GhZ71I2hOUzwRtJgGDWbEfDU3Z7FVPVvQb84chqU2Zw40V2wceOTxe1COUIz5IpAq1uRyU 4jmso28+otRGkE2tJg7CvmtY0tctMymJTs5BoI6VR1fB3TLA5cay1mICkSGERIturST7PP 2KwKeaZqQeqwg4YuDfOX50r+Tda0/s0= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-167-OkCP4SNCOAuopXw77MfKQQ-1; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:29:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OkCP4SNCOAuopXw77MfKQQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id x15so2655631wrn.0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:29:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v9AXR8INu2V1rXzlem4kdzH7dLRNBQB5Vc6BL374Yjc=; b=Zf7tg25QIHWPLUKmUCln988EBYES+WhBqkULMJNQs+SEfOZCsmcgjGFcVgyndqMmpz uli+gsSeeDbNkkKXdpue+JeRKZxR6NMqLEekomdsWSbwqQUqkfp3k0SojgNCNgc+ItTd OAKiwW8vCxaxmARzDHfVgeSFwBpRZnY1oIjH2w7yrQVKpVs5Bt2xAq/0NzzpekmvAyoL UlbKTrqB+jIbFXyABkPj2JONbUeEu32udvuDiDgjL2esfOLxUE92JfU1Bu6oZE7TtnoR ys3Q1K3kfsvCQHP3JwXLhQNGuRwj5oYFzTylnck7NTVO5M9KP/WJW0HnryqiYUbkDDxi 31+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubZ7xGtS/IIIWgMj5UINpPagjy5y4NkFZf35NZCInwXqHr5FNM1 UaFZIMSdiCXbjZt+EyeJlKhGBGSbboyPit4uBcs0ILZaXgwI8yD4qOPpmi1VeVRXU/qPLqdDhU4 n7GYzqPSw0QR0DHock/HYgE9I X-Received: by 2002:adf:a3d5:: with SMTP id m21mr4322769wrb.54.1587637787646; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:29:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:a3d5:: with SMTP id m21mr4322755wrb.54.1587637787471; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.150] ([93.56.170.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x13sm3273966wmc.5.2020.04.23.03.29.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: VMX: Handle preemption timer fastpath To: Wanpeng Li Cc: LKML , kvm , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Haiwei Li References: <1587632507-18997-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <1587632507-18997-6-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <99d81fa5-dc37-b22f-be1e-4aa0449e6c26@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:29:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/04/20 11:56, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> Please re-evaluate if this is needed (or which parts are needed) after >> cleaning up patch 4. Anyway again---this is already better, I don't >> like the duplicated code but at least I can understand what's going on. > Except the apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic) check, others are duplicated, > what do you think about apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic) check? We have to take a look again after you clean up patch 4. My hope is to reuse the slowpath code as much as possible, by introducing some optimizations here and there. Paolo