Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751905AbWCDSw4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:52:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751900AbWCDSw4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:52:56 -0500 Received: from mx03.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.106]:49124 "EHLO mx03.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751892AbWCDSwz (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:52:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL From: jamal Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: Patrick McHardy Cc: Adrian Bunk , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4409C6BA.60803@trash.net> References: <20060304160755.GB9295@stusta.de> <4409C6BA.60803@trash.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: unknown Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:52:21 -0500 Message-Id: <1141498341.5185.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1423 Lines: 45 On Sat, 2006-04-03 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > > > > --- > > > > This patch was already sent on: > > - 12 Feb 2006 > > Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions > within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still > needs more testing. Simple: Fix the bug and submit a patch. If you cant find the cause post what you are doing. What is the metric for going from experimental to non-experimental? I surely hope it doesnt come to some irrational reasoning like "Patrick found a bug"[1]. - It has been around since 2.6.7/8; - I use it extensively on about 10 machines since (I am pretty sure a lot more extensively than Patrick) - I know people who use it extensively - I am pretty sure there are people that i dont know who use it extensively So on Adrian's patch and above reasoning: ACKed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim cheers, jamal [1]If you used half of that logic on netfilter it would still be experimental or rather should be demoted to experimental. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/