Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1936251ybz; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJS/F/Hhz2ktZ2nC3joTWBB3XFk6nAAbAM5OR4y6I6RI48fxYBKljuBY5bYPWdjbbUMT9gm X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d4d3:: with SMTP id t19mr3108546edr.144.1587656327756; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587656327; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gf6c/XAltihKZqTSLnSifFPuggzf+m6hLlhbKx82GflEEc6Rm5cwKCbfnPujnnttX5 lU2pzWY5qjWtAQfnyD48SOspvvLXSQTqIm6CLA9meJ8UtFbhRPtp9j2WesiBI28Fhe9c Asj/aIJ50XkGJuTTGIHQjoGt6rbGVtHa7wvFJIYGdL9/UM8Bi4k0vhOwv1UfI+DMWjC2 IN28f7pgowmIcKk6hNR2oVVHRByMfOrVwU1fyGqRASmOGyUEugM8CNboXDgRU3+obbJR zhZiFPUNW+A56DuRFRpe8etw5O6CTSdjp3t/K2Kh2VL0Yf7ePTpxRtDJMyShPnyV0Yxi qA7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=K/ADEbkTdvq0/C1UZChVxzcpo9HMG4YmZJPDuX+MG2E=; b=GjKc2vYmpkLa/HTHd03uh2J7givZh+nX7fyvScHfFtCrRgyxN8JxcJNwPAxRCG6UHj vAWObFtt2DHS0NNd16l7ys4EQnDWL+pMUgBZLe9tSDznV+1hQeJVFjCsGT3fUPnSOl/o YPS56UYC3k3f37BM0emejZ/gAJqR7sjcpeyEqqVaJ2HxW3qyy1Aen4ycjBvirEDXz/b1 qyjawR1EqHMhsVXhX/vTwCmFYfAif4G3HPl5BboBM0FMTmxgYkM1STxrVoHcO4pAX69j C3aDQR+6mwy3pfB2Lsh1K/GEgGITn9O12gg7lxZQQiMrT5M7acz64jfTy1U70zEXIi/I EBGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ks5si1333011ejb.398.2020.04.23.08.38.16; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729295AbgDWPeg (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:34:36 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2090 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729261AbgDWPed (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:34:33 -0400 Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 84FE426C581A6B7BBBC7; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:34:31 +0100 (IST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.47.5.255) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:34:30 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/24] scsi: allocate separate queue for reserved commands To: Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Hannes Reinecke References: <1583857550-12049-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1583857550-12049-3-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <20200310183243.GA14549@infradead.org> <79cf4341-f2a2-dcc9-be0d-2efc6e83028a@huawei.com> <20200311062228.GA13522@infradead.org> <9c6ced82-b3f1-9724-b85e-d58827f1a4a4@huawei.com> <39bc2d82-2676-e329-5d32-8acb99b0a204@suse.de> <20200407163033.GA26568@infradead.org> From: John Garry Message-ID: <17c47c8c-f993-b472-43ac-936cec560744@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:33:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.47.5.255] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Not sure if we want a static scsi_device per host, or alloc and free >> dynamically. >> >> (@Hannes, I also have some proper patches for libsas if you want to >> add it) >> > Hold your horses. I wasn't going to do anything else... > I'm currently preparing a patchset implementing things by improving the > current scsi_get_host_dev() etc. OK, great, all you have to do is say. > > RFC should be ready by the end of the week. > Thanks, John