Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2059287ybz;
        Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKjzZk+vwkoLtIO3fH8F4f7D/WN685qfw/4mzygWkV/9kZ9TeLEmd5Whq+Uk8I2eurWudsj
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:ca45:: with SMTP id j5mr2856938edt.268.1587664242233;
        Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587664242; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=YoojpKq+o3o+S9vF7xjbd9I8eEaidQaXy3WDbQpkPPjiovZdA6Ng/H+0eOig702Oms
         xvO1Svx8QttTjxAkntl39FOxhf6kmY61dZdr7rHVPYb4iwVNfHnZtSH6qznbuCJSkc1F
         xyTa8p3iIQi1jw9Ofd0Ho57uwWjt+s56vbCgyiXgEj9q4Sr7ZHVIYbWJ8/2aJXuBQwno
         1xvD+PrTSfIHz4ZQyGRKBu3cEjP9VFrv+AbOdyqPGvGJhQ+JNcbTktf5XjL0NwQXHIOU
         SQQHk69rMN5r1vzOO0WlWwbC1Gy1ivn0K4oa+UQHoJgOfM+8txHO6jYUVhdhggHE/bg5
         Z5nQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to
         :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references;
        bh=23uzggVEj7jTd/H8h4stTMgGkgy+xW8sQqTSCwbqj50=;
        b=Vsk+hCS61v+Q3iIpEGjARptHDCvsciJZZwuCWe3t5zH5TDs4admSJdc26eYJoXW7i+
         20D6PRzhUU6WKqoppcYiT/EcMOLytgSzm1QwZ4bjvJsM+/pMZR1bktMgi3kWcfUiuZM0
         QwGkiGQh7f9EesXlL85XcCr7vlFw6xktYxMB+zBpdaswG33NoqYh1/fn7nNbGg6Zhi4i
         e9TSIMOor5jEEs2VRC6AmGumvOqXLprb0aQcDLcbshUyxYa6YEulJydX98mwFp8FEqSt
         JCU4d12QBkkl4mZHkheXIlF+MJV/LTqS9SmrMwCX1WSFUS0tWdNLmejEtyS3vUtYKnLK
         +M0Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m7si1455377edv.557.2020.04.23.10.50.19;
        Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1730103AbgDWRqx (ORCPT <rfc822;chenl.lei@gmail.com> + 99 others);
        Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:46:53 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44938 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1730093AbgDWRqw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:46:52 -0400
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
        by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8C230E;
        Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46])
        by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1C843F68F;
        Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CALAqxLURuJ-tMxMY6Z2BvLmyd6X+w7SiSB5otoH6vx+NxJm-NA@mail.gmail.com> <jhj8simxgqo.mognet@arm.com> <CALAqxLXGQa-sPjNQV-uXzJLOVMyJtHqdfk0J48dhs+WVbWu+Sw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: Invalid wait context with 5.7-rc2?
In-reply-to: <CALAqxLXGQa-sPjNQV-uXzJLOVMyJtHqdfk0J48dhs+WVbWu+Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:46:48 +0100
Message-ID: <jhj7dy6xfg7.mognet@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 23/04/20 18:29, John Stultz wrote:
> Oof. Way to twist the knife :) I'm probably to blame for that
> deferred_probe_work_func issue. I'll take a look at it.
>

Sorry :(

> thanks
> -john