Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751771AbWCDXUX (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 18:20:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751773AbWCDXUX (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 18:20:23 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-02-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.132]:12204 "EHLO ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751771AbWCDXUX (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 18:20:23 -0500 Message-ID: <440A2087.4020908@cfl.rr.com> Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 18:19:35 -0500 From: Phillip Susi User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phillip Susi CC: Pekka Enberg , Peter Osterlund , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] UDF filesystem uid fix References: <84144f020602130149k72b8ebned89ff5719cdd0c2@mail.gmail.com> <43F0B8FC.6020605@cfl.rr.com> <43F1FD39.1040900@cfl.rr.com> <84144f020602142331s756aff15o69d1d67f1b18127e@mai <43F37773.5030203@cfl.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <43F37773.5030203@cfl.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1470 Lines: 28 Finally got around to completing that patch. Take a look and let me know if it looks good. I posted it in the thread entitled "[PATCH] udf: fix uid/gid options and add uid/gid=ignore and forget options". Phillip Susi wrote: > Pekka Enberg wrote: >> Yeah, sounds much better to me. However, I am wondering if we can >> actually drop the nosave/save cases completely. Wouldn't we get the same >> semantics by letting uid/gid specify the default id and make the ignore >> case look like we're always reading -1 from disk, and never writing out >> any ids? So as a desktop user, you mount with "uid=", "gid=", and >> "force" passed as mount option and it works as expected. > > True, that would work. It would require the addition of another mount > option though, so I wonder, is that really needed? What problem with > the current patch would this solve? Is there really a need to save real > ids to the disk with the current uid option and no force? Keep in mind > that udf is meant for removable media where the uids aren't going to > make any sense in another system. > > > Maybe I'm just being lazy though... I'll dig back into it and try to > submit a new patch with the force option by this weekend. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/