Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2342184ybz; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:22:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKajssuhJjtDgFuSgzsUjVpnGLvURgP5EWU86pTVVjC/hx3h3KS+pXo/mcqo4GvOzkkcdAS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:18a2:: with SMTP id c2mr4825485ejf.167.1587684147871; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:22:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587684147; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=guoP6rkrldAGJdEMVYA5FMi3YyaXXRb1iPumWGlrdBwUZDZVEngNl2J92cicqwE0b+ VkbCEe1DY9ZJC1qr+7yH+SHrqKU57aJwxrs6HnPGLtCG2UaiusnyjX15qy90kVeC7uMv Mu/8q/FBgQGMbhkABb15B+dZXvLN658JG3ilpYzVxA4vS9aWlYMfKConqBJWXmlvingY lSyDuOdn6RN1I8BEQsbqTvcf0jpwAcawRgWIM6nGKdbTwJ91uVUr7zj33SAmcBMW3sQL zTv1AH99eTYtBY8f7cF5I2rWUUYSTrmSRKJ6aprESNBi2J9Y13sGHIC2T6wsB1HzPsvZ LY3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=SNrIEwwJY5LpdUZlT9pVlVWjI+dy+iivAGr9wteLsmg=; b=qCE5Ovb0RpuJ1spOlhgbNZF7f3urV+PsXA1g5eP3NLHHjtBcnnxMv+VH7hgOba2/rz VjSZ5oYhbthNOR4h0cpP3GZIw1pu6k3ebPBOlO33aRarwuZ7ln0MTgJ060rslP3QFcRf WDyVHpfd6oWEyqJaal10TEho/HIxjpkPXrIkxELbfpZR/VpoRjsDojr6uaNdL2OQNm5d auQv+quh/M13IFef1tzU/5Q4sQRuG6WV3GKczMO2KMoLI858gqKko03te8fXkawE39FG LplqOYJUNwYm2EpVrRUfDm/gseIyiV7ZEn/AxhGtJ+zfnioo2igFQ9Kb37zzfA8cW9IZ fTRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w14si307934edf.402.2020.04.23.16.22.04; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729284AbgDWXUu (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:20:50 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:48622 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728214AbgDWXGd (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:06:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.242] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvM-0004bi-3G; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:28 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvL-00E6kO-EU; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:27 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov , "Geert Uytterhoeven" , "Linus Walleij" Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:05:02 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 075/245] gpio: Fix error message on out-of-range GPIO in lookup table In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.242 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Geert Uytterhoeven commit d935bd50dd14a7714cbdba9a76435dbb56edb1ae upstream. When a GPIO offset in a lookup table is out-of-range, the printed error message (1) does not include the actual out-of-range value, and (2) contains an off-by-one error in the upper bound. Avoid user confusion by also printing the actual GPIO offset, and correcting the upper bound of the range. While at it, use "%u" for unsigned int. Sample impact: -requested GPIO 0 is out of range [0..32] for chip e6052000.gpio +requested GPIO 0 (45) is out of range [0..31] for chip e6052000.gpio Fixes: 2a3cf6a3599e9015 ("gpiolib: return -ENOENT if no GPIO mapping exists") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191127095919.4214-1-geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -2743,8 +2743,9 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(stru if (chip->ngpio <= p->chip_hwnum) { dev_err(dev, - "requested GPIO %d is out of range [0..%d] for chip %s\n", - idx, chip->ngpio, chip->label); + "requested GPIO %u (%u) is out of range [0..%u] for chip %s\n", + idx, p->chip_hwnum, chip->ngpio - 1, + chip->label); return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); }