Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2345305ybz; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:26:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ+ehSEtOVa+qLVynSPWvX+4XxeG1IqmIYDDXaw+uXq9qfkDneIIWhIRFMNyaF7CppqWQzB X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:41b3:: with SMTP id na3mr5025866ejb.250.1587684382898; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:26:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587684382; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l+i3WGV67muce2B7JG7KfvgDtZ1KxALY7tLoctqXk+PsPopXqA2Vgyt2/7M+IxLMxj QQKZ07GzFN8qNRCF5hr/VjXU6tKEg+vQRRbf7USDgWAKKGPqMQrMIH+MrUrzFMUnKpZL pHSbB0+wqCWmtNCrHuTxPwZ4IqkG2TrXw4WwAbQomyRzfHuHFntafiAXjXBel5wSVPry rsoYVCW8NOroiRhYYU9n0JU5IUzW06pfPNx/igwcIQOZiMhesnpFFryGElP/TFcjMp/4 ZeZcHE72PCR6EtQ6XTprY717mRXl4dOV3G4s+5G17OUiX6L62xUDuxdXYWJ+3N+J5pEa pmvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=3YT10zob0XOi2rocQyJ8pxJACZyNnDv07uBIBlUZSDg=; b=G++6uJmwfE87he9YJZiXjs6VegeATYWwu5odtdRr+69rNuvX45JsMMqyvCVKIbVZ/i 3vQ8j222IAo/XdJT3m1qIO4U1yOPyyZ1dAffmd3Z15v5U0j6c/cUvdfFfDl7Ih3iNyGY B3+iYgFh9E4QAbV7GxSt0diMlfE/rdrscdT4YTZzFZKEREAsG4m59FSlpBMqCERf6MpG 9vZvsqN5q+pKuMhDs2JgHmROpAPnxNG6yGaqJl0w12a93z43VpKnQQwoV9asWD2ugFi7 cGDOYlqWSKdEmM1fCEoAdDKIvTCYraO70tfgjUXWS52OAaRCBfQ0fVIPeo8zdLtxcD9U TgBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w15si2004196edi.597.2020.04.23.16.25.59; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729997AbgDWXYi (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:24:38 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:48266 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728134AbgDWXG3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:06:29 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.242] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvJ-0004aH-DS; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:25 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvI-00E6gR-H0; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:24 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov , "Ben Hutchings" , "Chris Mason" , "David Sterba" , "Liu Bo" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:04:16 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 029/245] Btrfs: detect corruption when non-root leaf has zero item In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.242 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Liu Bo commit 1ba98d086fe3a14d6a31f2f66dbab70c45d00f63 upstream. Right now we treat leaf which has zero item as a valid one because we could have an empty tree, that is, a root that is also a leaf without any item, however, in the same case but when the leaf is not a root, we can end up with hitting the BUG_ON(1) in btrfs_extend_item() called by setup_inline_extent_backref(). This makes us check the situation as a corruption if leaf is not its own root. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Chris Mason Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -520,8 +520,29 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct bt u32 nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf); int slot; - if (nritems == 0) + if (nritems == 0) { + struct btrfs_root *check_root; + + key.objectid = btrfs_header_owner(leaf); + key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY; + key.offset = (u64)-1; + + check_root = btrfs_get_fs_root(root->fs_info, &key, false); + /* + * The only reason we also check NULL here is that during + * open_ctree() some roots has not yet been set up. + */ + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(check_root)) { + /* if leaf is the root, then it's fine */ + if (leaf->start != + btrfs_root_bytenr(&check_root->root_item)) { + CORRUPT("non-root leaf's nritems is 0", + leaf, root, 0); + return -EIO; + } + } return 0; + } /* Check the 0 item */ if (btrfs_item_offset_nr(leaf, 0) + btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, 0) !=