Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2345617ybz; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:26:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ0vN2M+Ci/iuvo3RjROv6k3sqXxlsn9vIh+5az2kM6aSkyrjo+mh5Y85syY1OHB/F4ElHc X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:48b:: with SMTP id k11mr5012871edv.47.1587684404647; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:26:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587684404; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EVMkT/ZUnCXlAHs42k2mCveDXs3Aiw/eI5DkS5myENzq4RGj5A78x8LhhCPVgs9Nxs DNhVl3HNwwTDXv3/iAjGsWgznkvkEHL2AztOmwGgXDKSaW1+nAnieUKeK+v5+3j7PiTm WA/+XspB/5X30USoKN9gFJ3iyNK+mX1go/1+rc8H+s+oUvaqxK3D4Y0wgqi9QIQLrbis oC1NFWHYbWwslFWhfUuHs6zndLC3J4Fp7vywTgETGBx/+YpPoA+7t95x8sa3v7zv4TB6 LzjINf5FKOkCoLDfvswJO/rcXvSR7dOsV6NY3mDcm4rCGHCtZfPQe3MEOJ+Uyk8mrnCq +8Iw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=BoGc6FpHzvG+1h6MTRMmyuvj9DCMWSUl3vEPpLWPcg0=; b=rgJZxnEXRtms/0x4U+/p4cOomg7kIf44tqNskUfx7dK3pijuKDkedliJMSFf5QspLQ 3BD8KAJfF7P/oPkaCeojF9U5797qJPbzVOYCChN9INM+cZvEE7Mn4AxBH7Yeivk5TEpP dlOQNNR6DD6X8O6kMcG22pr2kL5CI90dXTd6/II632vsApOP9q+P7ibe8i8bzTKEqTYp ccE2c7TiodsTsfN587RqtEGhLD8rAqkuIexx5oG2dE1lZzGJ668s03p/V2fjKh59sH84 riBiSsipHy3nfJPpre90fFMj78R56rQMmRUKhETIvCI9iDJoO1uPNFdBkWJtgrjkSB/h 9pow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g7si1980765edk.195.2020.04.23.16.26.17; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729875AbgDWXYy (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:24:54 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:48264 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728126AbgDWXG3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:06:29 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.242] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvJ-0004aR-Kv; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:25 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvI-00E6gk-Lm; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:24 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov , "Ben Hutchings" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Liu Bo" , "David Sterba" Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:04:20 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 033/245] Btrfs: improve check_node to avoid reading corrupted nodes In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.242 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Liu Bo commit 6b722c1747d533ac6d4df110dc8233db46918b65 upstream. We need to check items in a node to make sure that we're reading a valid one, otherwise we could get various crashes while processing delayed_refs. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -508,9 +508,10 @@ static int check_tree_block_fsid(struct } #define CORRUPT(reason, eb, root, slot) \ - btrfs_crit(root->fs_info, "corrupt leaf, %s: block=%llu," \ - "root=%llu, slot=%d", reason, \ - btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->objectid, slot) + btrfs_crit(root->fs_info, "corrupt %s, %s: block=%llu," \ + " root=%llu, slot=%d", \ + btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0 ? "leaf" : "node",\ + reason, btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->objectid, slot) static noinline int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *leaf) @@ -601,6 +602,10 @@ static noinline int check_leaf(struct bt static int check_node(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *node) { unsigned long nr = btrfs_header_nritems(node); + struct btrfs_key key, next_key; + int slot; + u64 bytenr; + int ret = 0; if (nr == 0 || nr > BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(root)) { btrfs_crit(root->fs_info, @@ -608,7 +613,26 @@ static int check_node(struct btrfs_root node->start, root->objectid, nr); return -EIO; } - return 0; + + for (slot = 0; slot < nr - 1; slot++) { + bytenr = btrfs_node_blockptr(node, slot); + btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(node, &key, slot); + btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(node, &next_key, slot + 1); + + if (!bytenr) { + CORRUPT("invalid item slot", node, root, slot); + ret = -EIO; + goto out; + } + + if (btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(&key, &next_key) >= 0) { + CORRUPT("bad key order", node, root, slot); + ret = -EIO; + goto out; + } + } +out: + return ret; } static int btree_readpage_end_io_hook(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,