Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2346290ybz; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:27:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ/w2I9vb/k2Q50pyy8XmSrpzuOjuERcN1pg02/zBe2vZTTvyvch4kIDECcvTuXt/M1WYyL X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7f0d:: with SMTP id d13mr4867944ejr.312.1587684459447; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:27:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587684459; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dID3D9WyVek+fQpWZaXg7iBhzXTpjviZJUPbuO7gmdR5nYB5Zv5bOp9uU59phg7Srz FNK7d3ULbvFDMrSRg0ynQFuJllxD1bAyfVfi0kR99dGG6LbaJZuPM/qmpbKiA4flLQOK bHaAnGWPM+ciJEwkH8umJ1l3Pi665tI5JMth06FH8zQIgtqsfEFzwoAlakvSi1ALpTb0 9qtB/pyt+HkO80CRXUe5M75fZF0wJxlZ+oO72l3nwQmSn9wu/LMadJNgyRT7tacvILTY 2VVgXKC5zrkxUMnsRaK0GYlcVg+WfRMYnhqjcTTtC+usOCKt+QMnedfyGWtIHRD/k99J Qc7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=JHweKfxIZpOk8xSF4c1MAjrjtIVINH7cH3CaLCgfOso=; b=yuA4D9m49B5mK2du2AgSS1P2VgTPRi7fHRqKy3XUBZwR4AtQY4Pw8t6wddhQfB5qg4 MPvUCfCoJ+xrGoa/QuoLocMAKVOpxjsTpc0rRbyE0lbMyJjkHKBw0MhsH5wdbu+SmXy3 JcBADzOttrJm1YVg8VdpTpaOps/7Ke7piyGwCMEOqPls8Q+puKIMg140KDjOS1u0iFZZ OCsX+z0W5GxGJsomRFgeiLj0bsCpEyhBDhdY2Kxy80p97FkuQpo4ZMoHOjIlqmAqaEYY Mah5j42NvGzZZF4ud/qPU16ZXeZnhEhKwvZ6HvvJO7jhJiN9TbQBn3ylhCFBujuOn/BR 92zw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a72si1942136edf.28.2020.04.23.16.27.16; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729836AbgDWXXr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:23:47 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:48396 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728164AbgDWXGa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:06:30 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.242] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvK-0004ar-96; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:26 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jRkvJ-00E6hP-4S; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:06:25 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "David Sterba" , "Qu Wenruo" , "Ben Hutchings" , "Nikolay Borisov" Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:04:28 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 041/245] btrfs: Add checker for EXTENT_CSUM In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.242 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Qu Wenruo commit 4b865cab96fe2a30ed512cf667b354bd291b3b0a upstream. EXTENT_CSUM checker is a relatively easy one, only needs to check: 1) Objectid Fixed to BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_OBJECTID 2) Key offset alignment Must be aligned to sectorsize 3) Item size alignedment Must be aligned to csum size Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba [bwh: Backported to 4.4: Use root->sectorsize instead of root->fs_info->sectorsize] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -590,6 +590,27 @@ static int check_extent_data_item(struct return 0; } +static int check_csum_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *leaf, + struct btrfs_key *key, int slot) +{ + u32 sectorsize = root->sectorsize; + u32 csumsize = btrfs_super_csum_size(root->fs_info->super_copy); + + if (key->objectid != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_OBJECTID) { + CORRUPT("invalid objectid for csum item", leaf, root, slot); + return -EUCLEAN; + } + if (!IS_ALIGNED(key->offset, sectorsize)) { + CORRUPT("unaligned key offset for csum item", leaf, root, slot); + return -EUCLEAN; + } + if (!IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot), csumsize)) { + CORRUPT("unaligned csum item size", leaf, root, slot); + return -EUCLEAN; + } + return 0; +} + /* * Common point to switch the item-specific validation. */ @@ -603,6 +624,9 @@ static int check_leaf_item(struct btrfs_ case BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY: ret = check_extent_data_item(root, leaf, key, slot); break; + case BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY: + ret = check_csum_item(root, leaf, key, slot); + break; } return ret; }