Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp242910ybz; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:55:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ8w7OmmxPWzZORXAvMO7qeJRNvePoKBlILjZS+pZsmVMwaPEEvk1RcSKCJn9riT5JWaeiT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1303:: with SMTP id w3mr5648014ejb.275.1587707702186; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:55:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587707702; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MA00VKehzMgmekfQnt0SxbfIQfxlzwIBfZh5rEwAIU/I8Vs44KrYSdSuHl7gPeyVJn UzmZWc7JZLmmkSgJ6EEfUFpbevW5k6qoAiz3U5E0vmiusTtw3j0KkRY8akem0umLjT8m oIA97uY7mmQ3kstiHe0zwz++x5Mo3anhLK5uuJw0KsjXWSyiFb2VoRKTqW37iApDvp8W O377uXnXRmGzDBNUBhhr7ZcmixxnMreGMerHMRd8Gkv+fYe2MXIXPnq43Q2x7XWqAeC5 DdYW1cr0rpH1eTj1Hs1U/uAAqdF5EM0y1vRAZyPbFhM9WzNmzjaWivoaAM+R9ZX5IUEk hLIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=wUM7P7iVTehLX/5kLSqUItw6PtRy6YKwPNdcP4tqFDM=; b=rKmW8cjUdb8NwCs6t1kRdBAK0ie8hyAy2hCDCWI8JQCNE1+YHbjrJg11JcqphcYP6C T6TzRgkbi9Mito4zbf7kys5qgxwwNcjF25mOm0v76PDESB6u4A00UNU3LWvG3ws0wMym mC26zwswFViQQlw99rkHtyLoEEk66JKrPdL88RXSjYBcgBpL8lvzzoiKSn3r6/ZHq6HK TaadtNF9/Lozmiwa2wFIz+5Rv8hDHyBqsLFInJGLJ2CVUEJPxGr8HOtltR9xXKMkPwna hl06iuMVa96u3ldTmdP2Iv3i6WSlWe+MlKPLzmI/NjRGk0dFc/a7s1fJfDHxSMkeltSt 2L1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5si2369239edx.30.2020.04.23.22.54.38; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726606AbgDXFw2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:52:28 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37056 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726586AbgDXFw0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:52:26 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B48AEA8; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 05:52:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Davidlohr Bueso To: tglx@linutronix.de, pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org, maz@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, will@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: [PATCH 3/5] rcuwait: Introduce prepare_to and finish_rcuwait Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:48:35 -0700 Message-Id: <20200424054837.5138-4-dave@stgolabs.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 In-Reply-To: <20200424054837.5138-1-dave@stgolabs.net> References: <20200424054837.5138-1-dave@stgolabs.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This allows further flexibility for some callers to implement ad-hoc versions of the generic rcuwait_wait_event(). For example, kvm will need this to maintain tracing semantics. The naming is of course similar to what waitqueue apis offer. Also go ahead and make use of rcu_assign_pointer() for both task writes as it will make the __rcu sparse people happy - this will be the special nil case, thus no added serialization. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso --- include/linux/rcuwait.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcuwait.h b/include/linux/rcuwait.h index 6ebb23258a27..45bc6604e9b1 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcuwait.h +++ b/include/linux/rcuwait.h @@ -29,12 +29,25 @@ extern int rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w); /* * The caller is responsible for locking around rcuwait_wait_event(), - * such that writes to @task are properly serialized. + * and [prepare_to/finish]_rcuwait() such that writes to @task are + * properly serialized. */ + +static inline void prepare_to_rcuwait(struct rcuwait *w) +{ + rcu_assign_pointer(w->task, current); +} + +static inline void finish_rcuwait(struct rcuwait *w) +{ + rcu_assign_pointer(w->task, NULL); + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); +} + #define rcuwait_wait_event(w, condition, state) \ ({ \ int __ret = 0; \ - rcu_assign_pointer((w)->task, current); \ + prepare_to_rcuwait(w); \ for (;;) { \ /* \ * Implicit barrier (A) pairs with (B) in \ @@ -51,9 +64,7 @@ extern int rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w); \ schedule(); \ } \ - \ - WRITE_ONCE((w)->task, NULL); \ - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); \ + finish_rcuwait(w); \ __ret; \ }) -- 2.16.4