Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp639646ybz; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:52:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIE7r84kTFGGG1ONT31gMhRRmhOo92ObHkhkUUd3/hKCZ74fjY3oLEFeYBfAelUjf3rZ1gJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1713:: with SMTP id y19mr7562434edu.40.1587736343581; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:52:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587736343; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lwpaamWl3AepB5rAJSHxtmrwLoIOIvKZ4dStHIMiPclu4Ch5guHy6fNKwrVJakFjPn vnVmbyvGB8TjUJ+meFtHxuDr1NGxpiSD7TUdkELX4J0TQtYYg6+5uC7X76timcIP8VV+ k7mAApm/KRUywMAQVQWOTFLr8983mAFE0ihCH9e8SG/Jop6SLz8z8DyAC1aNspKjldwG TwtL4pFAwExRsmfiwuIYgogkScTDwMhdodxTboiWXNbJZyO4XTApqxc9U0f+dDY8OZh/ FyRIGHis/YvwYk+E88cYsZ7ORpfHBddUpoZ4KiL+SumrN1vWT3+wag2L7Bz6+bd4TRFf Gzpg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=HF86pVUxMTklxZVYU7MEXH17kuPp/l8gcAyjKHsC/UY=; b=BeqP14+9bYrHJeb58JL3uJPXMwj5lO+6nRWDrQjMkxRtynr3LJ8roEnH8RxYARG1Jo wDde208bbocqiGTwghlucfqreHbNxfza/IldE/5jP5PnDv7m9/WRGwgVxjqSblirb530 Yr1vpR5H6DELmFsRZRI2h8AE9ZIbqlZ6Bl6BUr1zClSPiBl7VLM3ytqJSXD9bjewUJ62 IXvw9mLwP4SNwSjWctrh7XBWJL3e56r3O6iH/Tpohl5c8n8olOBboJsywWG/GwvZWyjU SrttmB+SI0m7jUFQ8pq/tv0OKt0CPdx4orUjesR2expnIBYHchPVbds+BKKsIXvrU+Ly Wl+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gs23si3297256ejb.207.2020.04.24.06.52.00; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728300AbgDXNs2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:48:28 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:34824 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726968AbgDXNs1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:48:27 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C4A1063; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 877633F68F; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:48:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Qais Yousef To: Alan Stern , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Cc: Qais Yousef , Tony Prisk , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mathias Nyman , Oliver Neukum , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/3] usb/xhci-plat: Set PM runtime as active on resume Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:47:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20200424134800.4629-2-qais.yousef@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200424134800.4629-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> References: <20200424134800.4629-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Follow suit of ohci-platform.c and perform pm_runtime_set_active() on resume. ohci-platform.c had a warning reported due to the missing pm_runtime_set_active() [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200323143857.db5zphxhq4hz3hmd@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com/ Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef CC: Tony Prisk CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: Mathias Nyman CC: Oliver Neukum CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org CC: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- xhci_resume() here could fail, I wasn't sure if we need to call pm_runtime_set_active() unconditionally. I assumed not. There was another function xhci_plat_resume(), I think we just care about the PM runtime resume callback only. Please have a closer look. drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c index 1d4f6f85f0fe..7c6fd138072c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c @@ -422,8 +422,17 @@ static int __maybe_unused xhci_plat_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) { struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd); + int ret; - return xhci_resume(xhci, 0); + ret = xhci_resume(xhci, 0); + if (ret) + return ret; + + pm_runtime_disable(dev); + pm_runtime_set_active(dev); + pm_runtime_enable(dev); + + return 0; } static const struct dev_pm_ops xhci_plat_pm_ops = { -- 2.17.1