Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751367AbWCFGNs (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:13:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751359AbWCFGNs (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:13:48 -0500 Received: from s2.ukfsn.org ([217.158.120.143]:23196 "EHLO mail.ukfsn.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbWCFGNr (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:13:47 -0500 Message-ID: <440BD31C.9090801@dgreaves.com> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 06:13:48 +0000 From: David Greaves User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Lord Cc: Justin Piszcz , Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list , albertcc@tw.ibm.com, axboe@suse.de, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 References: <43F2050B.8020006@dgreaves.com> <200602141300.37118.lkml@rtr.ca> <440040B4.8030808@dgreaves.com> <440083B4.3030307@rtr.ca> <4400A1BF.7020109@rtr.ca> <4400B439.8050202@dgreaves.com> <4401122A.3010908@rtr.ca> <44017B4B.3030900@dgreaves.com> <4401B560.40702@rtr.ca> <4403704E.4090109@rtr.ca> <4403A84C.6010804@gmail.com> <4403CEA9.4080603@rtr.ca> <44042863.2050703@dgreaves.com> <44046CE6.60803@rtr.ca> <44046D86.7050809@pobox.com> <4405DCAF.6030500@dgreaves.com> <4405DDEA.7020309@rtr.ca> <4405E42B.9040804@dgreaves.com> <4405E83D.9000906@rtr.ca> <4405EC94.2030202@dgreaves.com> <4405FAAE.3080705@dgreaves.com> <4408C729.50401@dgreaves.com> <4409A369.1040607@rtr.ca> In-Reply-To: <4409A369.1040607@rtr.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1239 Lines: 30 Mark Lord wrote: > David Greaves wrote: >> Just FYI - I'm away (in Canada) for 2 weeks so can't do any additional >> testing until I return. > > Am I correct, in that your last test on rc5-git4 was a failure? It was *much* better than rc4 but it did have an error. I *think* the problem I'm seeing is likely to be similar to the one I orginally reported (on 2.6.15 IIRC) Same sporadic warning/error which didn't usually trigger the raid-boot-the-disk behaviour that the FUA code seemed to. > But without the "opcode" display in the error messages, > so we have no idea exactly what caused the errors (again!)? Yes. I thought the/a opcode-verbose patch was in there but I guess not. I don't have remote console access to the machine so wouldn't be able to carry out reliable kernel tests - sorry. Of course I'll do this as soon as I return. > > [Whatcha doin up here?] [:) 2weeks skiing in Whistler (this time - 10 days canadian canoeing in Algonquin last time!) Canada's great !!] David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/