Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp340296ybz; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:20:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ1KIMRmkw3IpWOk1d3F936YfeK2O860J8i0+4aQ5gcMr+TVS5D0PdBQIDlwgM71wvAk5/g X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1fc:: with SMTP id i28mr9785249edy.18.1587774002994; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:20:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587774002; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=igZHO42MdXH0qWJKHfTMuacN0Mu+npU9GqHEwj8KelAm2QKdsBlxYmDhuCHOLuey8S FhjlKdzFVovQZ7nsu60ULtQOiATvylRO3zz8G42tyNzzie6mkZbrBPG1VY06RXzsOFha D4+Rt6B1jyO3/faN50nlrHdWIRX6bPU8IW0TiclYKqlel2WAiV1FGAVvL559wGCR8+RC UUcNaz1EYz1fPZ1gSoqDcuDyfoGwYsUsefZc/a/yNcbwGgqxV4h8/670yLoUMtZb9c6T klF+ORTUdqyCojpMCly+E5/D3XjcgF0nH/vngb0GeSZ/GL0wyiPAIX2lGdvXZxQR2hNN gknQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=1N5YXbQL97SPK+hQrCQ0C0XPFOq+f8Ve7eYt4JHaFEo=; b=q3BjYzCuAZZY/eaB80fJpp6vjkQtOVcZaXj6+1A2wAsqVSrHKdl52Fmbi/RHZ9B0/N OQDW8wUlH1IsQLqAGVr8Hwro7YHoJBSwU/qVyguYFGnldv/l3uzb2MEuo+gIMGW07OYY 75Zc9RHXcJw1YKZVeAiHPrjYpHN4faGDUKHe36K2amZtf76RSaeNO6ub9T5Dq5Rg07Cs L9pKyI7PNGNriNqQKrLMaqQuDcLinKQ1qBC2ZUou5ndFbvgYcZuH5dkfuC5GH7DU13IF 4dvso1r7jhngx7u+5STspwxxMU5krFXrzCwPCyxkhhTz4aogiqHTlyLuPYAND6T2SlaD Wq2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="o4Y/4BMZ"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id do9si5014351ejc.515.2020.04.24.17.19.39; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="o4Y/4BMZ"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726116AbgDYAPi (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 20:15:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725851AbgDYAPi (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 20:15:38 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x142.google.com (mail-lf1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEF6FC09B049; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x142.google.com with SMTP id k28so9165989lfe.10; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:15:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1N5YXbQL97SPK+hQrCQ0C0XPFOq+f8Ve7eYt4JHaFEo=; b=o4Y/4BMZEVoOUbSDLvEQkeJjOW+h11pHfhICS7S0zllHKqAL+GAsqroYMdzInICDaN CgET2odzvyaEFsgA/ld6/IbR28XRZp2h7RNFF1YoUC7X4bzWWtYCLspse2cqfMcwo1EM FsWmiQqx/CUYX1ezGiMpZ4A1DsS+7VBE8ohiU1dCpryAuH8R6URzsMhuGHZYTLDjfdeq W2iQ8O+39ckiYc8hu9+kVzI96OTkrKaW+gzotheG2bEbxPcwp1h+jN0j+6QbvA0WaJ6U YZOOvhCPK3zmw37ch+ObIOMsLBGkaEUJfjL9My/EVVBjAj962mknxqPUMFP/D2f0UXfg FErg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1N5YXbQL97SPK+hQrCQ0C0XPFOq+f8Ve7eYt4JHaFEo=; b=EWWWr6ej5/T+BDvNktyxvtxOFp3/TBrNznZZcXHVgUv7Ld+icFAEhqiQcToL9UGU8J ld6jAl1PfFtwS+GhKjpQukvYgghkQ3ArzjPWisPBXjBMkmyLkdoWXuYR2FdA/GvqE0qC SdBeAYhCH6QmZoWs13bLvmCnOcLbyjEfiFRVMHnuS6aMgOPyeKGcHJViwuNfmTX9aKqr fQTgCrqJp6q6dtgFyAL10S9DTDpK3ejkZtgkZK2EP2dL4WO8ka7iXfGD2X4tA3gAjkGQ RYDSWosMDibgl4aCMrIFy31ylu6DyaSydbs+YPE9m61qsEvBwFvlR4mEh/6FgXkQyKwf ykiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZj6xKjhJCL1WOBAdKcNC1IMYJ145bX+kne84zlMsbbPVNcv8vI XKOvFWCPuIr+gTqHwNUDlwRleHJDgwqhc2bPdRU= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4426:: with SMTP id w6mr7927786lfl.8.1587773736160; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:15:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200422173630.8351-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200422173630.8351-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:15:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, x86_32: Fix incorrect encoding in BPF_LDX zero-extension To: Luke Nelson Cc: bpf , Brian Gerst , Luke Nelson , Xi Wang , Wang YanQing , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Network Development , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:36 AM Luke Nelson wrote: > > The current JIT uses the following sequence to zero-extend into the > upper 32 bits of the destination register for BPF_LDX BPF_{B,H,W}, > when the destination register is not on the stack: > > EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_hi), 0); > > The problem is that C7 /0 encodes a MOV instruction that requires a 4-byte > immediate; the current code emits only 1 byte of the immediate. This > means that the first 3 bytes of the next instruction will be treated as > the rest of the immediate, breaking the stream of instructions. > > This patch fixes the problem by instead emitting "xor dst_hi,dst_hi" > to clear the upper 32 bits. This fixes the problem and is more efficient > than using MOV to load a zero immediate. > > This bug may not be currently triggerable as BPF_REG_AX is the only > register not stored on the stack and the verifier uses it in a limited > way, and the verifier implements a zero-extension optimization. But the > JIT should avoid emitting incorrect encodings regardless. > > Fixes: 03f5781be2c7b ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32") > Signed-off-by: Xi Wang > Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson Applied. Thanks