Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1297224ybz; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:46:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJbKLI7EbI6zTrDfh5dijgbFA/g3/Zk0dyuXRYY/VMpkVq5CXHt6rZ6DyQ9WMGlt4krnzTW X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c38a:: with SMTP id k10mr13404242edq.74.1587854784438; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:46:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587854784; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=inM+vTdzNE3Bx4DtBSFbbF3PFl6nFKdoxXFMmut6skjhCYNUz1/RzB2lkMTLgJBWod cvAXFewlv/qhQ/WXIubOoB/sKhbM8QLbXY8AXNrxfFeN1rAwixxPB0DZ47Krhk1aQSVa eU1PqdAKNx0GokMFXLoknOHwPx+fdHOjRiFpQOsUlefufN/Nn8a7mxABSxKBS8liqSkG w3YAVgRMxYD2nI2TgifnqVZ7IfxAYCCb2lZm6MkjjGiv3wxwqOg1vK7MpZEEo4/9n7QW xdY+9SnkBoimsnm8WHhec5mf9RZRgrlP1av4cIBjUD5aAa1ck+8OAW7pYl5U+b2uTZ4a +tnA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Af5m8VA3SauBcQeDjw4RTDE0kr7azrR9NfAvGcbD1hE=; b=ZJ+PttT5A590YT0UCeSLtFdDwBjwOGTaAEeB+pPq0JUDPa4oFo9xkMhN7MorJIkm8G I0+J6VkuihUfKGeygh92LzsfQjSS9RDc+VNmpXN9wD1pCQhnRevFj1Zu2D11B3DeyDXK 2OwyjjFnT8YSVd4ghH7sj4u2q8Q6GLvVMub8CRV11WYfOGedYkYvW6CFmWm7hmHFo+KK l80ZeLy0IyNBVcVOGWWc46SDDchO9veWgTC0EH84vIvJp5cQYieLI4Y+mzkMrBN5TJXs CaNJ9CYq0gRNObqDDX1bKsD1BC+BKFUVBJuOepa0cAt7472MIXgsWOrSv0DngGYnXrLp tDyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s3si5620276edq.467.2020.04.25.15.46.01; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:46:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726361AbgDYWjl (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:39:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59992 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726232AbgDYWjl (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:39:41 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59430C09B04F for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jSTSJ-0004lU-Nd; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:39:28 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4688C100605; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:39:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Sasha Levin , Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andi Kleen , Andy Lutomirski , "Bae\, Chang Seok" , "Metzger\, Markus T" , "hpa\@zytor.com" , "bp\@alien8.de" , "Hansen\, Dave" , "Luck\, Tony" , Pedro Alves , Simon Marchi , "Shankar\, Ravi V" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Enable FSGSBASE instructions In-Reply-To: <20200423040850.GY1809@sasha-vm> References: <20200421195629.GE608746@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <5957D3CC-B54B-4A1A-998A-0E6F58589CF4@amacapital.net> <20200421205119.GK1809@sasha-vm> <20200423040850.GY1809@sasha-vm> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:39:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftcrtckg.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sasha Levin writes: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:00:16PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >>gdb and rr are certainly a good start. If patches show up, I'll take a look. > > I'm sorry, but what patches are we talking about? About patches which: - Are rebased to current upstream - Addressed the outstanding review comments - Have proper documentation in the changelog of the user space visible ABI changes why it does not break any existing usage and having the relevant people who maintain tools which utilize the affected interfaces Cc'ed on submission. - Made sure that the cleanups I did when merging them initially have been picked up. I'm not going to waste another couple of days on this mess just to revert it because it hadn't seen any serious testing in development. Thanks, tglx