Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 26 Apr 2020 08:51:00 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3
Message-ID: <20200426155100.bcbqnrilk45ugzva@ast-mbp>
References: <20200424064338.538313-1-hch@lst.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200424064338.538313-1-hch@lst.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:43:33AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series changes the sysctl ->proc_handler methods to take kernel
> pointers.  This simplifies some of the pointer handling in the methods
> (which could probably be further simplified now), and gets rid of the
> set_fs address space overrides used by bpf.
> 
> Changes since v2:
>  - free the buffer modified by BPF
>  - move pid_max and friends to pid.h
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - drop a patch merged by Greg
>  - don't copy data out on a write
>  - fix buffer allocation in bpf

The set looks good to me.
Should I take it via bpf-next tree ?