Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:57:48 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com,
       trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, aviro@redhat.com,
       linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
       nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]
Message-ID: <20060306135748.GA10519@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
References: <20060304041647.6894ca62.akpm@osdl.org> <20060302213356.7282.26463.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <29932.1141646154@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <29932.1141646154@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 884
Lines: 24

On Mon, 6 March 2006 11:55:54 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> 
> > The kernel won't compile with just patch #1 applied.  Patches shouldn't go
> > into git in that manner.
> 
> It's easier to review them in that manner. If you don't think git is up to it,
> then combine them.

Funny, I would have assumed that all patches should leave the kernel
in a state where it'd at least compile and boot.  Since when are
patches split for review an accepted exception?

J?rn

-- 
More computing sins are committed in the name of efficiency (without
necessarily achieving it) than for any other single reason - including
blind stupidity.
-- W. A. Wulf 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/