Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: INFO: rcu detected stall in wg_packet_tx_worker
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+0251e883fe39e7a0cb0a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        jhs@mojatatu.com,
        =?UTF-8?B?SmnFmcOtIFDDrXJrbw==?= <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, kuba@kernel.org,
        kvalo@codeaurora.org, leon@kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
References: <0000000000005fd19505a4355311@google.com>
 <e40c443e-74aa-bad4-7be8-4cdddfdf3eaf@gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9ov2ae08UTzwKL7enquChzDNxpg4c=ppnJqS2QF6ZAn_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <f2eb18ea-b32a-4b64-0417-9b5b2df98e33@gmail.com>
 <29bd64f4-5fe0-605e-59cc-1afa199b1141@gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9rR-_KvENZyBrRhYNWD+hVD-FraxPJiofsmuXBh651QXw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <85e76f66-f807-ad12-df9d-0805b68133fa@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:53:42 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9rR-_KvENZyBrRhYNWD+hVD-FraxPJiofsmuXBh651QXw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 4/26/20 1:46 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

> 
> Ah, whew, okay. I had just begun instrumenting sfq (the highly
> technical term for "adding printks everywhere") to figure out what's
> going on. Looks like you've got a handle on it, so I'll let you have
> at it.

Yes, syzbot manages to put a zero in q->scaled_quantum

I will send a fix.

> 
> On the brighter side, it seems like Dmitry's and my effort to get full
> coverage of WireGuard has paid off in the sense that tons of packets
> wind up being shoveled through it in one way or another, which is
> good.
> 

Sure !