Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:29:11 +0100
From:   Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "cpu/hotplug: Ignore pm_wakeup_pending() for
 disable_nonboot_cpus()"
Message-ID: <20200427102910.b6iysyumiz5pj4sv@e107158-lin>
References: <20200409112742.3581-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
 <26038947.HFycnDbHsR@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <26038947.HFycnDbHsR@kreacher>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 04/26/20 17:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I would do this the other way around:
> 
> 1. Make x86 call freeze_secondary_cpus() directly, rename
>    enable_nonboot_cpus() and drop disable_nonboot_cpus().

All of this in a single patch?

> 2. Get rid of __freeze_secondary_cpus().

I guess you're implying to drop the revert too and manually unroll it instead.

Could do.

Thanks

--
Qais Yousef