Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751037AbWCFTpZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:45:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752001AbWCFTpY (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:45:24 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:46987 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbWCFTpY (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:45:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060306190636.GA14849@mellanox.co.il> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: RFC: move SDP from AF_INET_SDP to IPPROTO_SDP X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 Message-ID: From: David Stevens Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:48:53 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM121/03/M/IBM(Release 6.53HF654 | July 22, 2005) at 03/06/2006 12:49:03, Serialize complete at 03/06/2006 12:49:03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 583 Lines: 12 I don't know any details about SDP, but if there are no differences at the protocol layer, then neither the address family nor the protocol is appropriate. If it's just an API change, the socket type is the right selector. So, maybe SOCK_DIRECT to go along with SOCK_STREAM, SOCK_DGRAM, etc. +-DLS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/