Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3005519ybz; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:21:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIIRIwWifyjLbGuxvdAEi+oGuewbzH2bxpJ/UIuWPJ+P3NgMf/gOaWUaY1rYEmeJFPwB1/h X-Received: by 2002:a50:d5c8:: with SMTP id g8mr19386609edj.370.1588000877942; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:21:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588000877; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Mb395ovBcwYTDYX3jTGFkEKJaZq2prCZYDBYxXT6fzXDw0JwmH0QgPtcPS73OOsOM7 Gq/7rlR8dJQeRAHC15f5dwJ8bXlvWhXgZL2krJgbmm6vGQk4DX8uQrC0ha9eL+kWQzoq PPdgv+PLg6jeyhsPkT/kQLz+91f/7wXkerpC0LlU8krL+XRxOwM+9rCdbtyaenGzMSIm 0Ol/YsqUVx5/affO85jLyZr3NyG8/I8RI8DmEmEjep36qRFqsJzQxFK0NGKdDVKxTKFL J3g/MMM37cyNj3pGimtQwwqceCioa346Bcm/3j07EbPrpzerKoK2Zk3dOdUfjxgPNIx+ pfXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=Xsf3NZ9BhpHshjgb1/ar04Dy2oA0NVnjd70yOBM9Dn8=; b=MFBzhLARHyURdfzb229ok//Us5XAoUBNOVfNzW1F+zu/2esnznvmFJrg3vqUrWdV1P dJlVgjgGBc7Q7UbOXAcp1jZfxdYIjG5mIHp/mn7rUaUJe6+Ic+fB9L+3vaD5tWoeM+CC kKR96BdPBzr3Nbx4kuKSxVNIUXgJIOslZutMu2RDyAO7F5eUokzXYm7KFgZMrJUFuJBv 5gtJUfYmnSkv0EbuZQppPAU9doBUp3iaBha2bAHU6DTn+iPrPOgNau7MmYU3ZyKzi3os oNIWWgW3bQHbG3ikW5xwwFl+YhCsq5WTiq6AMRcBRP/7mIU0+Xal0npZ52d1kB9Rigfq HLQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cd11si8410157ejb.435.2020.04.27.08.20.54; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728231AbgD0PTR (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:19:17 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:40256 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726539AbgD0PTQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:19:16 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03REYsO2070456; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:19:15 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mfhd35ee-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:19:15 -0400 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 03REZsou075191; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:19:15 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mfhd35db-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:19:14 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03RFAKWU001097; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:19:12 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30mcu6v3ty-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:19:12 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03RFI1KG65798558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:18:01 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C520CA405B; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF5BA405C; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc2783563651 (unknown [9.145.84.115]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:17:39 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: Harald Freudenberger Cc: Tony Krowiak , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: store queue struct in hash table for quick access Message-ID: <20200427171739.76291a74.pasic@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200407192015.19887-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200407192015.19887-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200424055732.7663896d.pasic@linux.ibm.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-27_10:2020-04-27,2020-04-27 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004270123 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:05:23 +0200 Harald Freudenberger wrote: > On 24.04.20 05:57, Halil Pasic wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:20:01 -0400 > > Tony Krowiak wrote: > > > >> Rather than looping over potentially 65535 objects, let's store the > >> structures for caching information about queue devices bound to the > >> vfio_ap device driver in a hash table keyed by APQN. > > @Harald: > > Would it make sense to make the efficient lookup of an apqueue base > > on its APQN core AP functionality instead of each driver figuring it out > > on it's own? > > > > If I'm not wrong the zcrypt device/driver(s) must the problem of > > looking up a queue based on its APQN as well. > > > > For instance struct ep11_cprb has a target_id filed > > (arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/zcrypt.h). > > > > Regards, > > Halil > > Hi Halil > > no, the zcrypt drivers don't have this problem. They build up their own device object which > includes a pointer to the base ap device. I'm a bit confused. Doesn't your code loop first trough the ap_card objects to find the APID portion of the APQN, and then loop the queue list of the matching card to find the right ap_queue object? Or did I miss something? Isn't that what _zcrypt_send_ep11_cprb() does? Can you point me to the code that avoids the lookup (by apqn) for zcrypt? If you look at the new function of vfio_ap_get_queue(unsigned long apqn) it basically about finding the queue based on the apqn, with the difference that it is vfio specific. Regards, Halil > > However, this is not a big issue, as the ap_bus holds a list of ap_card objects and within each > ap_card object there exists a list of ap_queues.