Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3104986ybz; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:03:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL5F8GIbO/rXESSvWnfbK2cYNkSMRGiWEZyi96fBbRYz1Q1KlLN0tHcL3bCdJupLFOi1376 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6d90:: with SMTP id h16mr20144803ejt.117.1588006981883; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:03:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588006981; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=M+b1bRIsSMzZmIdGoHbWjEVxF3KcpxybuiPQ0y5fzdToUQLHntKQ7SOnRd8eL9ojRQ h0t2xIR/f1lW1So1eV8pXPJFN8n5Da616+c66HuqlPMUjRgDjAMVdU6XVip5lPSrQz2h dkYPyZqYua7oNIvkAFVOMwfH9h6Y+s0+vDTqD+/kytRzA18KYCA8Ot9NLVgkmY08n2hP ZAnXmKamkFIn6azdKGopZVWDfeqkQZKP4MYwS0yB+4oi8DvWiegKSDw+CvXKtjoEFfDr MGsHttlMFsP4OBf2eV7+AhV0GygpuziGueMAOLzOepDuMT35bX7zAfGLcMjvFNJA4AqQ AR8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references; bh=VVQFoPABinrMrVnxlgqXTfk850fnWI+MEqNqTMAWNps=; b=y9Nan6fPIAGn36tKPZ4PWXXDg9sWBpE+tMWoc+FLAzuorMLTffu+y8w5ml5EfHSk9k sl6M1KNcbl3rWCTNMuc8ffq1/ThWUHDItcXJdhcqgREjZ13uDmd0Z1kY5I/MYBnjtcev 7y3xqPIf/eJ50N6ERvXOXY6D77qBjY1uKquWsFfp11pq5sUvYEA9uRnbFrHQjrMWXgLa DEOgJek+ghQePAUMFHd8lhW6Smsc7kljD3ZWKMjyCfWivE7Txjwy5C7g0FxqlqaPbV2N mzYKomqLAZ6mVaQKBpffs8oSoAvBh/urYYiTpr/3Ib5ghNYJYHlIUDFO5ZQRaEu0pFcl R93A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x14si98242ede.22.2020.04.27.10.02.34; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726306AbgD0Q63 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:58:29 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:38340 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726030AbgD0Q63 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:58:29 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F481063; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57E8A3F68F; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:58:27 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200422112719.826676174@infradead.org> <20200422112831.574539982@infradead.org> <20200427163540.45wrw5kaakxzrokj@e107158-lin> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3 From: Valentin Schneider To: Qais Yousef Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/23] sched,psci: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() In-reply-to: <20200427163540.45wrw5kaakxzrokj@e107158-lin> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:58:15 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/04/20 17:35, Qais Yousef wrote: >> drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev); >> @@ -349,11 +347,6 @@ static int suspend_test_thread(void *arg >> if (atomic_dec_return_relaxed(&nb_active_threads) == 0) >> complete(&suspend_threads_done); >> >> - /* Give up on RT scheduling and wait for termination. */ >> - sched_priority.sched_priority = 0; >> - if (sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, SCHED_NORMAL, &sched_priority)) >> - pr_warn("Failed to set suspend thread scheduler on CPU %d\n", >> - cpu); > > No need for sched_set_normal() here before the busy loop? > Given the tasks become TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, and the only extra thing they'll do is exit (barring the parking weirdness), changing them back to CFS seems superfluous. > Thanks