Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3156867ybz; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:00:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI1ccQjGHvmThK7d5CfjPv+dEs67g86XX1rdovj3DfHKQgJqXojSO273kAYxtUh+FevXKU+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:bce4:: with SMTP id op4mr19375022ejb.174.1588010406088; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:00:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588010406; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qoYXj2mfseyCEq3bG4L0MKdOyp0PwvzoRdrkxQK0AUqaM/Mx/w1lGPxZ9YeCy8Dbkm 8vE4k80Odxrnj2wzDDiFA8Ibu4DqYohsQXWb7SXyL9lE62Fun8fDaVjaftQexNi7ak/g XStSKrLW/H0UCDfsDubjwCUIKkZQh9yFg6j4Yica1K2hGba7/XraIPd8pHV9zupLcVim hKVY8ZQNlkfVeP2JdgT7RGdSDLOh2y0dzOXN5pQRWH/dPcAlcLziuqc8lX0/xUOeNWDL JZy0tNwmf0nIRWsgcJippbtRs53PLB843surPCBcLOfmEnsuhyHUmSG1Hq4JsrFCtGVp 9amw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=64ICkJ9RroMwYnA6qVLQT7Ga0PPK4u1uPYsI/T/EVqc=; b=NCCc9QQ0kHPzVMb9vc/QmDwiF2GOj8V+8oQsrvxG5By5M2jSCUpfm77JXSkzGsPyp4 x+hLbmAzLTZxh27X17jn9oaH53RbBBuH4V3O4N6AcSCY6FEeYU3IPteK3kGsCDrr1ddY FnO8K0xuyE4Px/YR1fmXgNpRF1iLCcdjSEUEggPANEwyT93HtH61Lur/9ITNFQq9w1Ig Jqf9G9gdxEHjg4EPA73A8KkaNQ1K7o4BK6XQR30xaVN3HcObx/ieEtxOkB4ox2PwFksF DflUCejtdYR27U9JYXQLzCCHM9AJGhgdbK+VJrea7L7YZLm1qRq579eQnBuh6Ax96kOJ 2AHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o22si192166ejh.233.2020.04.27.10.59.42; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726228AbgD0R6H (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:58:07 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:59629 "EHLO relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725963AbgD0R6H (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:58:07 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 42.111.30.142 Received: from localhost (unknown [42.111.30.142]) (Authenticated sender: me@yadavpratyush.com) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DE7B1C0005; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:25:36 +0530 From: Pratyush Yadav To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Mason Yang , vigneshr@ti.com, tudor.ambarus@microchip.com, juliensu@mxic.com.tw, richard@nod.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, Pratyush Yadav Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for Octal 8D-8D-8D mode Message-ID: <20200427175536.2mmei2fy6f7bg6jm@yadavpratyush.com> References: <1587451187-6889-1-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> <20200421092328.129308f6@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200421092328.129308f6@collabora.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/04/20 09:23AM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > +Pratyush who's working on a similar patchet [1]. > > Hello Mason, > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:39:42 +0800 > Mason Yang wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This is repost of patchset from Boris Brezillon's > > [RFC,00/18] mtd: spi-nor: Proposal for 8-8-8 mode support [1]. > > I only quickly went through the patches you sent and saying it's a > repost of the RFC is a bit of a lie. You completely ignored the state > tracking I was trying to do to avoid leaving the flash in 8D mode when > suspending/resetting the board, and I think that part is crucial. If I > remember correctly, we already had this discussion so I must say I'm a > bit disappointed. > > Can you sync with Pratyush? I think his series [1] is better in that it > tries to restore the flash in single-SPI mode before suspend (it's > missing the shutdown case, but that can be easily added I think). Of > course that'd be even better to have proper state tracking at the SPI > NOR level. Hi Mason, I posted a re-roll of my series here [0]. Could you please base your changes on top of it? Let me know if the series is missing something you need. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200424184410.8578-1-p.yadav@ti.com/ -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav