Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 12/17] leds: lp55xx: Add multicolor framework support
 to lp55xx
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>, <pavel@ucw.cz>
CC:     <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200423155524.13971-1-dmurphy@ti.com>
 <20200423155524.13971-13-dmurphy@ti.com>
 <24aa265c-46ca-1643-7781-9ddbf734405b@gmail.com>
 <4f149443-87f9-ca3f-e131-2b494cbfed84@ti.com>
 <9ebe27ee-4dc5-110a-3897-328f5bbba902@gmail.com>
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Message-ID: <908edfaf-fda5-55db-a1e2-88b2bd89ebe3@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:58:35 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9ebe27ee-4dc5-110a-3897-328f5bbba902@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Jacek

On 4/27/20 2:42 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On 4/27/20 8:17 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Jacek
>>
>> On 4/26/20 11:07 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> One nit below.
>>>
>>> On 4/23/20 5:55 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>> Add multicolor framework support for the lp55xx family.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/leds/Kconfig                      |   1 +
>>>>   drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c                |  14 +-
>>>>   drivers/leds/leds-lp5523.c                |  14 +-
>>>>   drivers/leds/leds-lp5562.c                |  13 +-
>>>>   drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c         | 178 
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>   drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.h         |  11 +-
>>>>   drivers/leds/leds-lp8501.c                |  14 +-
>>>>   include/linux/platform_data/leds-lp55xx.h |   8 +
>>>>   8 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.h 
>>>> b/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.h
>>>> index b9b1041e8143..a9d7ba3f2fd1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.h
>>>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>>>>   #ifndef _LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON_H
>>>>   #define _LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON_H
>>>>   +#include <linux/led-class-multicolor.h>
>>>> +
>>>>   enum lp55xx_engine_index {
>>>>       LP55XX_ENGINE_INVALID,
>>>>       LP55XX_ENGINE_1,
>>>> @@ -109,6 +111,9 @@ struct lp55xx_device_config {
>>>>       /* access brightness register */
>>>>       int (*brightness_fn)(struct lp55xx_led *led);
>>>>   +    /* perform brightness value to multiple LEDs */
>>>> +    int (*multicolor_brightness_fn)(struct lp55xx_led *led);
>>>
>>> Isn't some word missing here? IMO it should be rephrased.
>>> Maybe "write multi color brightness to hw" ?
>>>
>> But brightness_fn does not say write_brightness_fn so I think this 
>> would look weird to add write to the function name
>
> I referred to the comment, not to the function name.
> And the comment for brightness_fn is vague IMO.
> So I propose to change both comments:
>
> s/access brightness register/set LED brightness/
> s/perform brightness value to multiple LEDs/
>   set multicolor LED brightness/
>
Obviously I misunderstood.  I thought that was for the preceding line of 
code that the comment was made.

I will update the comment.

Dan