Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752433AbWCFVYP (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:24:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752426AbWCFVYP (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:24:15 -0500 Received: from kanga.kvack.org ([66.96.29.28]:60603 "EHLO kanga.kvack.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751656AbWCFVYO (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:24:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:18:54 -0500 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Dan Aloni Cc: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: Status of AIO Message-ID: <20060306211854.GM20768@kvack.org> References: <20060306062402.GA25284@localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060306062402.GA25284@localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 27 On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 08:24:03AM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to assert the status of AIO under the current version > of Linux 2.6. However by searching I wasn't able to find any > indication about it's current state. Is there anyone using it > under a production environment? For O_DIRECT aio things are pretty stable (barring a patch to improve -EIO handling). The functionality is used by the various databases, so it gets a fair amount of exercise. > I'd like to know how complete it is and whether socket AIO is > adaquately supported. Socket AIO is not supported yet, but it is useful to get user requests to know there is demand for it. -ben -- "Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important." Don't Email: . - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/