Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3641816ybz; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI4wG/4/vs4s3CM2YUZ1a9nv98xZZwTxhpyoswfOS4wk+ne3F9N8BPsIs20yJVphufIZJ8z X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:b11:: with SMTP id h17mr23855116ejl.371.1588044174636; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588044174; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s9mS+CypHyGf4m7c2AEwupQh0YBqNLIaOX6Eib6fbs13inZH5EpY6OxSSr5c056NPj wmGS6ZMxorXYTtxmYV6efYsnx+8dsDBb0AjSacLeD9f3hvtozUwlWVDrr372NnyUnn6I myUjw9n55UpX0S1MNBqgemB0mtTr5O7dRr+OLG4UvTj1ywkw+9LDFhaMI2XRCJvX++Hl EYaqsyDVup2gFtfiW6KzCCnReTGZvctTeU6ZqMr1j+cdKGuFeMgRc6QnTr0QK8mbUncy Z1sOPM3RZqsbMt4zhVKgRKQuijri83GmNYnGXV3NnnY7QMwnEFOveJfjJbCWp2HB2pdu JKUg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=YABJFkt59zUyXbcSV5fPztqQfZPjlv+mCI7nZfPAoOk=; b=OnJu7XzNdvp9ZeliOj2OO4BdyjYvWpv9y6oqKc6x4MBdJsj7prlpWngCB87hCuoXsu jQrFbqYhNvzfgkBb8NBxwkQz4zzFQ+OD8phVvoMCkRVho+x0BwpokXNbBtp2OEL5A3nc gR88bHpk9k5Ll83qYIcp99fe9So3VH2JkCIT37kFp0K8pZ7plEYG4M2PPUA3VCFf2kqj W1ojQ3cJasl9w1BSSy4UZeIZfJS6ZI5ZauaRb7Q0sHG+bUAH0tDraRbF7GaSA8mehBo5 t6XXonE8ZTZ5X2gPiWIO4NKL27sOCpO2/il3j4XbCx2CwgsQTUcZJPnIMeDnXkaSGsLY a+fg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bi10si931603edb.465.2020.04.27.20.22.31; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726315AbgD1DUK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:20:10 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:49195 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726047AbgD1DUK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:20:10 -0400 IronPort-SDR: +XarSrE4j/eQYjdHSLRhLTeseDQhefCxnbBpzm6XuImxfTFLgQjvub6JUMUnVabX5YXCkn/6iA 2DTvd8GNvKgw== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2020 20:20:09 -0700 IronPort-SDR: WSXjJD7yfJNRSt+e6bVRZ/9EXUgYGHUogadn+DgqjX31mBV3nNdPhkHVhNzE2iJxDttzcbGSI2 sYsU9AXf5LPA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,326,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="336503126" Received: from djmuller-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.231.74]) ([10.255.231.74]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2020 20:20:08 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] PCI/AER: Use _OSC negotiation to determine AER ownership To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com, Jon Derrick , Alexandru Gagniuc References: <20200428000213.GA29631@google.com> From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:20:07 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200428000213.GA29631@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On 4/27/20 5:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I split this up a bit and applied the first part to pci/error to get > it into -next so we can start seeing what breaks. I won't be too > surprised if we trip over something. Any reason for the split? I don't see reason for still keeping HEST parser.