Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932360AbWCFVfg (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:35:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932366AbWCFVfg (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:35:36 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:65396 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932360AbWCFVff (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:35:35 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,168,1139212800"; d="scan'208"; a="259900169:sNHT59701156" To: "Sean Hefty" Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] IB: userspace support for RDMA connection manager X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:35:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Sean Hefty's message of "Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:21:04 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2006 21:35:27.0676 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2A75FC0:01C64165] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 630 Lines: 16 I think it makes sense to merge patches 1-5 independently of this patch. The kernel interface is needed by iSER and NFS/RDMA, and maintaining compatibility isn't a huge deal, so we can merge it now (assuming it looks mergable). On the other hand I think it would be good to let this userspace interface cook a little more, say in -mm. Anyone have any problems with that plan? - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/