Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932373AbWCFVmc (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:42:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932372AbWCFVma (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:42:30 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:60647 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932370AbWCFVmY (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:42:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:42:34 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20060306.134234.61724983.davem@davemloft.net> To: rdreier@cisco.com Cc: sean.hefty@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] net/IB: export ip_dev_find From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 20 From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:31:05 -0800 > Sean> Export ip_dev_find to allow locating a net_device given an > Sean> IP address. > > My plan is to queue all of this stuff for merging in 2.6.17. > > Is there any objection from netdev or openib-general people? > > I just looked back, and the original "unexport ip_dev_find()" patch > was a de-Bunk-ing change. Now that there is a modular user, is there > any problem with re-exporting it? I'm fine with re-exporting it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/