Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:56:06 +0200
From:   Tomasz Duszynski <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
CC:     Tomasz Duszynski <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] iio: chemical: scd30: add core driver
Message-ID: <20200428075606.GB6908@arch>
References: <20200422141135.86419-1-tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com>
 <20200422141135.86419-2-tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com>
 <CAHp75VcbaGYj76qkDJnTnuG5SM215qVmFo7FLR6YzHA37PgF_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200424190413.GA2731@arch>
 <CAHp75Vdajf7Ci3ytxP7Qs9=fFaxvVBQoL5uh+HUDwxHS5r9MUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200425184130.GA37271@arch>
 <CAHp75Vez8wSaYHbXmvfXUS5N+vScQqHGg055DNKrEnCunP7awA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vez8wSaYHbXmvfXUS5N+vScQqHGg055DNKrEnCunP7awA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:52:25PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 9:42 PM Tomasz Duszynski
> <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 02:43:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:05 PM Tomasz Duszynski
> > > <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:49:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:22 PM Tomasz Duszynski
> > > > > <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > As for ABI that's in
> > > > a separate patch.
> > >
> > > It's not good from bisectability point of view. If by some reason this
> > > patch or documentation patch gets reverted, the other one will be
> > > dangling.
> > > Please, unify them.
> > >
> >
> > Huh? Reverting core and leaving leftovers would be wrong and pointless.
>
> Exactly my point why it should be one patch. To secure impossibility
> to do pointless reverts.
>

But the same applies to other driver parts like i2c or serial
interfaces. I don't buy it.

>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko