Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932366AbWCFWCs (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:02:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932379AbWCFWCs (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:02:48 -0500 Received: from dsl093-040-174.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.40.174]:61625 "EHLO aria.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932366AbWCFWCs (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:02:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:02:25 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Michael Bender Cc: s.schmidt@avm.de, kkeil@suse.de, libusb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org, opensuse-factory@opensuse.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [Libusb-devel] Re: 2.6.16 serious consequences / GPL_EXPORT_SYMBOL / USB drivers of major vendor excluded Message-ID: <20060306220225.GA20265@kroah.com> References: <20060217230004.GA15492@kroah.com> <20060306170542.GB8142@kroah.com> <440CA520.8070507@sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <440CA520.8070507@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 22 On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:09:52PM -0800, Michael Bender wrote: > (Since this came to me via the libusb list, and we've kind of > gone past libusb-specific-related discussion, I thought I'd > add another question to the thread). > > What's the rationale behind the dichotomy between userspace > and kernel licensing models? Hm, how about starting a new thread for this? As it's way outside the scope of this one, _and_ it's pretty much off-topic for all of these lists :) As for the rationale, see the lkml archives for details. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/