Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3872510ybz; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:46:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLPY1ic44NOPC5tgUO1ECO6nfIHsElMyfXKgejrZe4OkFIXmr7FtFb/sTYXB4PMn56114Md X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5918:: with SMTP id h24mr24225852ejq.210.1588063619102; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:46:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588063619; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iYlCmpHo1wGKW6ZewATeeKeXFKdoRwab2rMXowp2n7bC6v4qHF/OxSAMnx8KFR11q8 jc6WnU4Ezz/P2i+bA2bfXS66PvPdoMkK2NZqk5BEZ3MnRBXih+uuXPUz+FkpEpAoWJmQ UK4s3+ggchKL9CS8v8S8Bg/MKRaRVdJPonQNdsbbpdj+R4x/QMHP1d99CZ+QDl83foAN NKYsbMOYWlEKkb8ced0SO0RB0DDGjDv2lR9zK2waOB5mnOFetFggW2YAiOc915oJdYCQ hbkq/15O0BgvHeSjPvlLyftIj9tu0fB5+WIq8QKwvHEezBAwAu7ZLn55rGvBHVsYWEfw ujnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=7hLKqtVxk5+Ryr+0DACwwusHUgMcRNBRNNRpKobBeGQ=; b=MnF+Dw2X/vXh0Rnz8F3OysN6sjZLekIsQHFz7okiF4yHbEzfmehCmp1iCBrAIYrVCi MekEoNTl+rTuLs+F1qNKU0dN5pb2TaMtHJRE/gAFQ5FTatmcNDIA8vBnotofQEE5WFO6 w1JJN3SHy2G6okyJTN9JqJ9QVdZ9p94T85PBpUoV1DJ4c9I/d9MZKIbltAzPgWP6Id3N Xx0mM0BedwTSFd1ZUXWYYsndCDM1rSAPZyPP+3q/5NF3/HXOSPs+WuuL3wsBr94dxoGd YyIqbDlmmclIqpgPFcHMsceSB54Y1lXf4kRJXJVuzT/CZtjS6roqf32mFpt2lbL3SLf1 /R8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d16si1094775eds.428.2020.04.28.01.46.36; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726904AbgD1InE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:43:04 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:35424 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726573AbgD1InD (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:43:03 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 5CE801C0265; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:43:01 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Dan Murphy Cc: jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 02/17] leds: Add multicolor ID to the color ID list Message-ID: <20200428084301.GC20640@amd> References: <20200423155524.13971-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200423155524.13971-3-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200425195242.GA1143@bug> <003891b8-a697-6d55-3862-5773e23a466a@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003891b8-a697-6d55-3862-5773e23a466a@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon 2020-04-27 12:12:18, Dan Murphy wrote: > Pavel >=20 > On 4/25/20 2:52 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >On Thu 2020-04-23 10:55:09, Dan Murphy wrote: > >>Add a new color ID that is declared as MULTICOLOR as with the > >>multicolor framework declaring a definitive color is not accurate > >>as the node can contain multiple colors. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy > >Please merge with previous patch, and you can keep reviews. >=20 > Not sure we should do that.=A0 The previous patches deals directly with t= he > bindings and this is code. >=20 > I thought the rule was to keep bindings and code separated. >=20 > It made sense to squash the bindings header patch to the bindings document > patch but it does not make sense to squash this patch to the bindings. >=20 > Please let me know if you want me to proceed with the squash. Well, OTOH it seems wrong to have array that is only half-initialized... But it is not a big deal. Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAl6n7JUACgkQMOfwapXb+vKOxQCffeMiLO16ErCjGnPSc4HtSVu3 Bm0An1e04aRx8T6MkLO1cxxUF3Lr2skC =iN50 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qtZFehHsKgwS5rPz--